Graham Hancock, Georges St Pierre, Tyler Engle, DeDunking Discussion

2 thoughts on “Graham Hancock, Georges St Pierre, Tyler Engle, DeDunking Discussion”

1. Thomas Jue says:

   I have been following Graham Hancock. I have listened to all of his interviews with Joe Rogan. I am appreciative for his exhaustive work.

   Reply

   7th October 2026 at 9:19 pm
2. A Robin says:

   Let’s get one thing straight here: Science is not some vetted institution or organization, it is a way of reasoning, whose philosophy in a nutshell is all about finding flaws — that is finding flaws in your reasoning, your logic, your facts, your methods, your theories, etc, and then going back and correcting them. Anyone can do that at anytime, therefore anything that interests humans falls under the regime of science, including theology (and ayahuasca visions, Graham). Speaking of mistakes, don’t make the mistake of confusing “science” with “scientist” or with any of the “-ologies” — all of which are just arbitrary labels for something that may or may not actually be a practice of the philosophy of science.

   I too have come across this aggressive, overly-antagonistic mentality of current authorities, but I think it is ancient and ingrained. Case in point: The Church, which literally persecuted scientists for thousands of years, scientists like Galileo and Copernicus, who promoted facts which didn’t fit within the fake Church narrative of the Earth being the center of the Universe because “that is the way God would have wanted it to be … trust me!”. Who do you think burned down the world renowned Alexandria Library, and its treasure trove of (now lost) Egyptian knowledge like that of the pyramid makers or Thoth? Authoritative Church policy has always been the exact opposite of a scientific or reasonable stance. I mean instead of finding flaws so they could eliminate them, they would look for certain flawed ideas to promote their fake religious agenda. Fast forward to today’s world and I see the Church repeating history by telling archaeologists (and psychologists) what they can or cannot say, and to aggressively persecute those who do not follow that fake narrative.

   I disagree that the world is being run by teenagers, I think it is more like the world is being run by juvenile delinquents.

   I was recently reminiscing about whom could meet in my next life to be my wife/lover, so that got me to thinking about what kind of sex life we would have, and I came to the realization that no matter how great the sex is, after you’ve done anything 999 times, it becomes boring and predictable. So what could I imagine with my future lover that would be great, if I’ve already done it a thousand or million times before in a past life or two? You have to completely start over from scratch with no knowledge of any prior art for it to be fresh and great again, otherwise it would be too predictable and boring. That same logic applies to everything else in life too. Without that amnesia of a prior existence, life wouldn’t be worth living over and over and over, again.

   “The universe may be programmed to evolve towards self-consciousness, but it is quite prepared to wipe out not merely individuals, but whole species and even planets in the process. The cosmos is no respecter either of Upanishadic sages or millions of seeds, young insects, fish-fry or, for that matter, dinosaurs should serve as an awful warning to us. The survival of the evolutionary process itself and the drive towards self-consciousness is all-important, that of specific gene-types a good deal less so; but the survival of the individual or group is — except to the individual or group itself — of no account whatever. Humanity, in short, is dispensable” (BEYOND BELIEF, Peter Lemesurier, pg 173)

   Reply

   13th October 2026 at 1:24 am