Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center (Public Domain)

 

NASA is an extraordinary organization that has fascinated millions of children and adults alike since its founding in 1958. Many believe NASA knows much more about the universe than is typically revealed to the public. There are multiple examples of photos being edited or altered to hide or prevent key pieces of information from reaching the public realm. NASA claims they recently found a new object in the far reaches of our galaxy. However, they don’t know what the significance of the object is, but what if I told you the object was already documented in a declassified CIA government report from 1983?

On January 11th, 2024, NASA staff writer Frances Reddy published an article on NASA.gov, “NASAs Fermi Detects Surprise Gamma-Ray Feature Beyond Our Galaxy”. NASA official Alexander Kashlinsky, a cosmologist at the University of Maryland and NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt commented that the object was a completely “serendipitous discovery”. Alexander continues, “We found a much stronger signal, and in a different part of the sky than the one we were looking for.”

In addition, a scientific paper was published by Alexander and two of his colleagues on January 10th, 2024, reading this discovery. The paper contains technical information and scientific data and explains how the object was discovered.

Typically speaking, there have been many books published by former government officials. For example, Colonel Philip Corso who worked in the Pentagon’s Foreign Technology Division under General Arthur Trudeau. Colonel Corso’s book “The Day After Roswell” reveals that at any given moment in time, the Government has technology that is at least 30–40 years more advanced than what the mainstream public has access to. Knowledge and Technology that comes to mainstream is never “NEW” technology. More often than not, technology that makes its way into the public realm has been known and developed for decades secretly by government officials and agencies. Once the tech is approved for release, it is handed off to a suitable corporation to mass produce and develop.

The declassified CIA report “Gateway Process” was submitted to top military officials by Lt. Colonel Wayne McDonnell in June 1983. The report is meant to go into a deep analysis involving a type of meditation created by the “Monroe Institute”. The meditation is done by listening to two different tones in each ear, which are played back on different frequencies, causing a synchronization of the left/right hemispheres of the brain. Enabling the participant to learn how to access higher dimensions and astral projection, potentially leaving time/space altogether.

In the past decades, many individuals started the meditation program with level 1. Maintaining regular practice, you can move to the very advanced meditations which teach you to tap into the entire collective consciousness. In order to maximize success, use of a brain wave scanner to measure how long the state of “Alpha” can be maintained while meditating is a good recommendation.

Individuals have shared that when they started their meditations, their scores for maintaining alpha were 30–40%. However, with practice, focus and determination, users have been able to reach 80–90% in some cases, proving that the method is transformational for those who attempt it and take it seriously.

According to the Gateway Process report and multiple other declassified documents, the Government has used these techniques for decades to train psychic spies, remote viewers, influence reality and to obtain higher degrees of knowledge and understanding of our universe. In portions of the report, Commander Wayne McDonnell provides a deep, concise analysis of consciousness, REM sleep. He also talks about the truth regarding the holographic makeup of our universe and all matter that exists.

The report argues that solid matter does not exist and that all matter from the earth itself to all objects, even humans, at the quantum level, is entirely comprised of vibrating atoms and energy fields. The human brain, which is also a construct of the Universe, is programmed to see objects as they appear by decoding them based on the frequency at which they vibrate.

Just like magnets, matter, which takes the shape of solid objects, has naturally occurring forces that repel the matter in our bodies through counter-magnetic fields so that we can’t just pass through them seamlessly. The entire notion argues that the universe is a conscious life form and all matter is the same and connected. Furthermore, matter itself can contain consciousness too.

On pages 21 & 22 of the report, there is a clear depiction of how consciousness is created through what is referred to as a “White Hole”. The report outlines how a white hole exists on the edge of our galaxy. The drawing below, copied from the actual CIA report, shows that the white hole creates a flow of energy moving from it with a “north/south” flow meeting again back at the white hole, which, like a black hole Jetstream, sends the energy towards our galaxy.

Depiction of our Galaxy from the CIA Declassified Report showing a white hole sending energy into our black hole while a “Torus” circles to the north and south nodes, connecting with each other and creating consciousness.

Based on this evidence, it can be argued that the detected gamma energy hits our galaxy’s black hole just like light hitting a prism, which is then dispersed across the galaxy. Each life form in existence receives a portion of this energy which is interpreted directly by our brain and used to create our consciousness and our entire reality.

Depiction of a “Jet Stream” sending Energy across vast distances in space. (PD)

The great scientist and inventor Nikola Tesla himself once stated:

“My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe, there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated the secrets of this core, but I know it exists”.

Is it possible that Tesla was referring to this object, which he would not have been able to identify at the time but would suspect existed due to his scientific understanding of the true nature of the universe? Nikola Tesla was obsessed with wireless power, which, in some ways, mirrors how our brain also receives a wireless signal to create our consciousness.

The CIA’s Gateway Process report details the “Absolute”, which is depicted as the source of all knowledge and inspiration that all living beings have access to; however, on Earth, most of humanity is unaware of its existence or of how to access it. Ultimately, this means that every single human comes from a shared consciousness, and each one of us represents a small piece of it. Ultimately, this means that when we hurt or do harm to others, we are, in fact, harming ourselves.

The report also explains why today’s mainstream scientists believe the universe is expanding at a continued rate. However, in actuality, it only appears that way to humanity because our Milky Way galaxy’s precise position in the universe puts us in an area with a direct line of sight that allows us to observe the flow of time pulling objects along where they will eventually circle back resulting in the flow of time going in the opposite direction. This also potentially means the universe could be a lot older than the currently accepted 13.7-billion-year-old age.

Depiction of the Universe from the CIA Declassified report showing how objects follow the flow of time and circle back also the relation of how the white hole is sending energy outwardly and the connected black hole is taking energy in.

Humanity should also examine the possibility that with this knowledge, the universe did not start with a Big Bang at all. Could it be that it was created in a similar manner to a tree or flower growing from the ground? Stretching out, growing branches, leaves and blooming, ultimately becoming conscious of itself and creating the complexity we see today over billions and billions of years of evolution.

Whether this theory proves to be correct or incorrect, it appears clear that the Gamma Rays NASA has detected recently are sourced from the same object depicted in the CIA report in 1983—which is itself a topic worth discussion and debate.

The next step to getting to the bottom of this would be to reach out to NASA to inquire about the finding and the CIA report; however, perhaps unsurprisingly, my attempts to do this have been met with complete silence.

One might argue that NASA doesn’t always answer people; however, I can safely say since I was a child, I would often reach out to NASA asking for information on the space program, achievements, or scientific endeavors which I would, in turn, use for school projects or personal development and every time NASA would respond immediately.

I once even emailed NASA to inquire about climate change prevention technology, such as large industrial plants with collectors designed to literally suck the carbon out of the atmosphere and store it deep underground. NASA scientists and officials responded to me promptly.

Regarding the topic outlined in this article, I emailed NASA for the first time on January 22nd 2024. The email included Francis Reddy, the individual who published the recent article detailing their findings, Claire Andreoli, who is NASA’s Media Contact for the NASA article and Alexander Kashlinsky himself, who is the cosmologist quoted in the article. Also included in the article is the public inquiries mailbox. I sent the NASA scientific team a copy of the CIA report and asked them to examine the findings as well as the image depicted of the Torus, and I asked them to comment. Is it the same object? Any thoughts or comments? However, after repeated emails, I have been met with stone-cold silence.

As weeks went by with no response, I added more and more NASA officials to the email thread. I sent out emails once or twice a week to follow up. I also included multiple friends and family who were CC’d in the note. It has been nearly three months, and NASA has still not said a word. To date, approximately 25 emails have been sent, and no response of any kind has been received.

There are over 30 NASA officials copied, including all the heads of the scientific programs and Bill Nelson himself. The Public Affairs office and Media Relations are included. These mailboxes usually respond to emails very quickly. Another interesting fact to note is often when emailing, I receive an out-of-office auto-response from some NASA officials who went on vacation, which means that the email did arrive and is being ignored for whatever reason.

I suspect the emails are being ignored because NASA is aware of what the object is; they are aware of the CIA report and the true nature of the universe and clearly the US Government has since 1983 at least! However perhaps information like this isn’t released all at once; maybe it’s done intentionally and staggered in a way which is controlled.

It is certainly understandable why, especially in 1983, it was prudent to keep such things secret as the public was not ready for such transformative information. However, in my view, in today’s 2024 information age, humanity has evolved, and we know more today than we ever have throughout our entire history. If humanity can ascertain the true nature of the universe and it becomes widely accepted, there is no stopping the advancement in technology, which could perhaps even enable humans to travel anywhere in the cosmos.

Regardless of NASA’s agenda, truth is timeless and once known, it cannot be broken. All of humanity deserves to know the truth about this object, and no human has a right to prevent another human from gaining knowledge or understanding of the universe or themselves.

What do you, the reader, think this object is? Are they related?

I hope this article sparks lively discussion and debate or, at the very least, inspires the reader to contemplate fundamental questions about the nature of the infinite universe in which we exist, such as, does all consciousness come from the same source? Is the universe itself conscious, and do we represent the eyes and ears of that consciousness where our experience becomes its experience? Is mainstream academia wrong about the Big Bang? In reality, is our universe eternal, and what we call the Big Bang is perhaps our galaxy circling back and forth through time indefinitely? And does this mean that death is an illusion? There is no end, only different states of existence. I will keep the emails to NASA going, and if you want to be included, feel free to drop me a line with your email address.

Steve Bsharat

Contact Steve at – [email protected]

Steve Bsharat, a father of 2 children, is an ENTJ-A Type personality with 22 years of experience working in banking technology from Toronto, Canada. Steve deeply enjoys the study of History, Astronomy, Cosmology, Astrology, Philosophy, Science, Mythology, & Human Psychology. Steve is a Monroe Institute Gateway Experience enthusiast. Steve is a friend to nature and animals and an excellent gardener. Steve enjoys numerous hobbies such as skydiving, white-water rafting, scuba diving, ice hockey, amateur boxing, learning to fly small aircraft, gaming, & sound/technology. Steve enjoys cooking and trying different types of foods from all over the world. Above all, Steve is a Seeker of Truth and Knowledge who forges his own path in search of a deeper understanding of reality and the universe. Steve believes such knowledge can help move humanity forward in a positive way.

Contact Steve at [email protected]

21 thoughts on “The Potential Truth of the Universe & NASA’s Hesitation to Acknowledge”

  1. Edmond Furter says:

    The idea of a physical and/or energetic ‘source’ of matter, energy, and meaning, is mistaken. Philosophy had long ago revealed that the perpetual source and sustenance of matter and energy, is archetype. Manifesting via matter, it is named Physis. Manifestation comes with a self-organisation, Dighe. This philosophy was known in Egypt in the various theologies, including at Edfu (in Demotic versions of hieroglyphic texts, see the article on Edfu adjacent). Archetype does not have a physical or energetic cite or time or ‘origin’, it is pre-existent, and perpetual. The result is plain to see in the Periodic table of elements, by rigorous Proton numbers. And in the rigorous structure of energy shells in Protons.
    I have been fortunate to find the Periodic table of culture (extracts are in my AOM and other articles on this site, and on Academia, and Researchgate, and in the anthropology journal Expression).
    The reason I engage with this article above, is to note a typical example of conspiracy ‘theory’. One of our eight cognitive biases (Goodwyn, etc) is to assume that authorities, and rare insights, are all connected. ‘They’ have the full picture, and some ‘leaks’ get through to ‘us’. This is one of the biases that enable and sustain ‘secret’ societies, using the illusion of discovery by connecting some dots for initiates. Your article seems to have some kernels of truth, but your premise and paradigm is misplaced. Rather connect the dots, and drop the anti ‘conspiracy’ posture.
    There are some sciencte conspiracies, of course, but they are intuitive, semi-conscious, and thus not real, intended conspiracies. And they are easily exposed. See for example my expose of the SETI ‘idea’.
    Wake up and smell the science. Eddington, Schrondinger, Zipf, and most scientists struggle to find the laws of nature and culture, and to raise them to conscious understanding. The greatest barrier is in the human sciences, since most people, including scientists, do not want to look in the mirror too hard (Graeber and Wengrow comment on that).
    There are many tech secrets of course, but the science behind them could not be hidden.
    Conspiracy ‘theories’ (assumptions) are cultural crafts. Rather practice science.
    I sympathise with pop sciences as victims of the deficiencies in the human sciences. Anthropology, in particular, still carries a heavy burden of cultural taboos. But your subject is physics and astrophysics, a highly advanced science, where pop anthro need not intrude.

  2. Edmond Furter says:

    Here is my expose of SETI, a semi-privatised arm of NASA (incidentally to keep ‘aliens’ and pop science out of their hair). SETI was (and still is in its the EU Space Agency legacy) a spontaneous organisation for drafting new myth, and sometimes funded (recently cut off, and self-funded), and endorsed, by the need to feel in control of occasional supposed ‘contact’ incidents (‘we have prepared for that’). Comments are welcome here; https://www.academia.edu/112811634/SETIs_aliens_are_modern_myth_by_Furter_E_D_2023_Stoneprint_Journal_8_extract_for_Academia_and_ResearchGate

  3. Edmond Furter says:

    Among my motivations for posting the link above, is the physics cosmology in the part about Eddington, relevant to your article.
    The torus shape of the universe that you cite is probably correct. Torus or thorus is perhaps the simplest ‘boundless’ solid of matter-energy and thus of space-time.
    There are great ‘secrets’ behind the self-imposed veils of ‘conspiracies’. Ignore the posturing, face the inconvenience of self-deception, and follow the laws of nature to discover who and what we are (as Schrodinger had formulated the ‘Big Question’ that science should answer).
    We do deceive one another for all sorts of unfair advantages, but science is free, and understanding is the ultimate democracy.

  4. Blaine Mattison says:

    A fact of the article is numerous NASA staff would not respond to the authors inquiry, therefore being a conspiracy to not respond.
    There is no theory, just the fact.
    Using the conspiracy theory term applied to the author only shows the respondent’s agenda.

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Indeed, it is sure suspicious isn’t it? I mean you could email them right now and ask them about the Mars rover or inquire how to become an astronaut or ask to have some info on the Orion space craft for a school project and they would respond instantly.

  5. Edmond Furter says:

    The introduction alleges conspiracy: “Many believe NASA knows much more about the universe than is typically revealed to the public.” Which raises several questions. Does NASA know more than academic physicists? Does it study a science outside astro-physics? Does it run statements via a confidentiality policy? Could the author know as much as NASA?
    And then there is the statement about how we, the common reader, could bypass this supposed secrecy: by ‘evolving’. LOL. After ‘creating the complexity we see today over billions and billions of years of evolution’, if as though we had evolved ourselves, and/or are still evolving. This is an explicit statment: “in today’s 2024 information age, humanity has evolved, and we know more today…” If as though information and knowledge is cause and effect of evolution.
    My agenda is anthropology, and social anthropology. Why do most people believe (without evidence) that our species is still evolving? Why do most people conflate tech with evolution? And conflate science with evolution? Perhaps you could answer these questions, since the author probably uses the term ‘evolution’ in the common or garden, unscientific, corporate sense.

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Hi Edmond, you make a great array of comments and insights. I do believe evolution never ends. Everything in the universe is a constant state of change, growth including life and including humanity. This is not a “Conspiracy” this information has been known since the 80’s clearly and humanity itself is currently becoming knowledgeable enough to understand it and not fear it. Thanks for sharing your expose, I am looking forward to reading it.

  6. WakeUp! says:

    We live at the center of a Toroidal Field
    Everything is generated through electromagnetism
    We are light manifested into physical form
    Outer Space doesn’t exist and NASA knows it (So does Elon)

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Have you ever observed Elon when these topics come up in interviews? In my view, it seems he is trying very hard to create confusion and act like he doesn’t know anything when he clearly does! He is certainly knowledgeable about things when he wants to be 🙂

  7. John D says:

    There is a letter agency paper describing consciousness written as a result fo the Remote Viewing program run by the DOD in the 70s 80s and 90s. Essentially it describes consciousness a a Black Hole of revolving information. That paper was available by googling very deeply, tough to find but it is there. The Buddhists have been talking about consciousness, energy, & matter for 2000 years. A review of some of the Tantric views of the universe as pure awareness are more sophisticated than the above. They have been researching contemplative science for a long time.

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Yes, I have read it. Could it be that the human pineal gland works in a similar manner to the blackhole?

  8. Plebney says:

    Also, no human has any right to demand any information from somebody else. No agency can reply to the questioning of every crackpot sending goofy questions to them.

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Its not a crackpot question, the government already released this information. People send discoveries to NASA all the time. They do not want to acknowledge because they are not ready to confirm it.

    2. Derek says:

      Is NASA not funded by public money either directly or indirectly? If it is, they surely have an obligation to respond to those that fund their existence and who would reasonably expect to be kept informed as to the result of such funded work? Such agencies are happy to take our dollars and then redact or remain silent on findings that, in their opinion, are far too ‘sensitive’ for us plebeians funding the work.

      1. Steve Bsharat says:

        I agree with you Derek and yet still no response what so ever. Even the public affairs office is copied.

  9. Dave says:

    What the crap is this article? It just rambles on about nothing. Get to the point!

  10. Edmond Furter says:

    Steve, you ‘believe evolution never ends’, but how does that apply to our species in recent centuries? What evidence do you use, that we have recently evolved in any way at all? What knowledge ‘since the 80’s’ is relevant to out supposed continuing ‘evolution’? How were we different in the 1800s? 1700s? Eg Benjamin Franklin. BC 6000s? Eg post Gobekli Tepe. BC 20 000s? Eg Ice Age rock art. I am asking for evidence of sapiens ‘current evolution’. Not for tech or science development. Unless you could demonstrate that tech and/or science is ‘evolving’ us. What were we incapable of at any time in our past?

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      Hi Edmond, the evidence is everywhere.

      Our capacity for knowledge and understanding is in a constant state of growth.

      We can use for example women could not vote but we evolved to allow them to vote.

      We can argue that slavery used to be accepted however we evolved because we understood it was wrong.

      As we expand our minds we expand our capabilities.

  11. Ivan Vukadinovic says:

    Hi to all readers. This is a great article but I believe it describes or tries to argue that the Universe is the absolute, but it is not. If you consider channeled information like Bashar from Daryl Anka, and of course others, it becomes obvious that the Universe is a kind of a mind construct, not even a hologram. The things you describe are all just constructs and meant to serve as a catalyst for experience. Nothing really exists as an absolute.

    1. Steve Bsharat says:

      That isn’t what’s being argued, the white hole is transmitting the consciousness to our galaxy as energy. The absolute is anything and everything. Also the universe will never end. It’s eternal.

  12. Bokka du Toit says:

    Thank you, we need more visionaries like yourself to shift us out of our divided world, it all begins with a dream, we certainly need a new worldview, a collective human one. Please fwd me more info. Bokka du Toit, South Africa. [email protected]

Leave a Reply to Steve Bsharat Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Some basic HTML is allowed.