The Balochistan Sphinx Temple Platform with steps, pillars, niches and a symmetric pattern.

Concealed within the desolate, rocky landscape of the Makran coastline of Southern Balochistan, Pakistan, is an architectural gem that has gone unnoticed and unexplored for centuries. The ‘Balochistan Sphinx’, as it is popularly called, came into the public eye only after the Makran Coastal Highway opened in 2004, linking Karachi with the port town of Gwadar on the Makran coast.1 A four-hour, 240-kilometer-long drive through meandering mountain passes and arid valleys from Karachi brings travellers to Hingol National Park, where the Balochistan Sphinx is located.

It is a four-hour drive from Karachi to the Hingol National Park, along the Makran Coastal Highway. The Balochistan Sphinx is located inside Hingol National Park.

The Makran Coastal Highway. Source:

The Balochistan Sphinx

The Balochistan Sphinx is routinely passed off by journalists as a natural formation, although no archaeological survey appears to have been conducted on the site.2 If we explore the features of the structure, as well as its surrounding complex, it becomes difficult to accept the oft-repeated premise that it has been shaped by natural forces. Rather, the site looks like a gigantic, rock-cut, architectural complex.

A cursory glance at the impressive sculpture shows the Sphinx to have a well-defined jawline, and clearly discernible facial features such as eyes, nose, and mouth, which are placed in seemingly perfect proportion to each other.

(a) The Balochistan Sphinx of Hingol National Park, ©Bilal Mirza CC BY 2.0.

(b) Face of the Great Sphinx of Giza, ©Hamerani CC BY-SA 4.0. Striking similarities can be drawn between its face, and that of (a), the Balochistan Sphinx.

The Sphinx appears to be decked up in a head-dress that closely resembles the Nemes head-dress of the Egyptian pharaoh. The Nemes headdress is a striped head-cloth that covers the crown and back of the head. It has two large, conspicuous, flaps which hang down behind the ears and in front of the shoulders. The ear-flaps can be discerned on the Balochistan Sphinx, as well as some stripe marks. The Sphinx has a horizontal groove across its forehead, which corresponds to the pharaonic headband that holds the Nemes headdress in place.

One can easily make out the contours of the reclining forelegs of the Sphinx, which terminate in very well-defined paws. It is difficult to see how nature could have carved out a statue that resembles a well-known mythical animal to such an astonishingly accurate degree.

The Balochistan Sphinx resembles the Egyptian sphinxes in many respects.

The Sphinx-Temple

In close proximity to the Balochistan Sphinx is another important structure. From a distance, it looks like a Hindu Temple (like those of South India), with a Mandapa (entrance hall) and a Vimana (temple spire). The top part of the Vimana appears to be missing. The Sphinx is reclining in front of the temple, acting as protector of the sacred site.

The Balochistan Sphinx reclines in front of a temple-like structure. Source:

In ancient, sacred architecture, the sphinx performed a protective function, and was generally placed in a pair on either side of entrances to temples, tombs, and sacred monuments. In ancient Egypt, the sphinx had the body of a lion, but its head could be that of a man (Androsphinx), a ram (Criosphinx) or a falcon (Hierocosphinx).3 The Great Sphinx of Giza, for instance, acts as guardian of the Pyramid Complex.

In Greece, the sphinx had the head of a woman, the wings of an eagle, the body of a lioness, and according to some, the tail of a serpent.4 The colossal statue of the Sphinx of Naxos stood on a towering ionic column, at the sacred Oracle of Delphi, acting as a protector of the site.

In Indian art and sculpture, the sphinx is known as purusha-mriga (‘man-beast’ in Sanskrit), and its primary position was near the temple gateway, acting as a guardian of the sanctuary.5 However, sphinxes were sculpted all over the temple premises including the entrance gates (gopuram), halls (mandapa) and near the central shrine (garbagriha). Raja Deekshithar identified 3 basic forms of the Indian sphinx:

  • A crouching sphinx with a human face, but with certain lion characteristics like mane and elongated ears
  • A striding or jumping sphinx with a fully human face
  • A half-upright or fully-upright sphinx, sometimes with moustaches and long beards, often in an act of worshipping a Shiva-linga.6

Sphinxes also feature in Buddhist architecture of Southeast Asia. In Myanmar, they are called Manusiha (from the Sanskrit manu-simha, meaning man-lion). They are depicted in a cat-like crouching posture at the corners of Buddhist stupas. They wear a tapering crown and ornamental ear-flaps, and have feathered wings attached to their front limbs.7

So, throughout the ancient world, the sphinx acted as a protector of sacred places. Perhaps not coincidentally, the Sphinx of Balochistan also appears to be guarding the temple-like structure adjacent to it. This suggests that the site was laid out in accordance with the principles of sacred architecture.

A closer look at the Balochistan Sphinx-Temple reveals clear evidence of pillars carved on a boundary wall. The temple entrance is visible behind a large pile-up of sediment or termite mounds. An elevated, sculpted, structure to the left of the entrance could be a subsidiary shrine. Overall, there can be little doubt that this a massive, man-made, rock-cut monument of great antiquity.

The Balochistan Sphinx-Temple shows clear signs of being a man-made, rock-cut temple.

Interestingly, there seems to be two monumental sculptures carved on the façade of the Sphinx-Temple, right above the entrance, on either side.

The carvings are heavily eroded, making their identification difficult; but it looks as if the figure on the left could be Kartikeya (Skanda/Murugan) holding his spear (vel); and the figure on the right, a striding Ganesha. Incidentally, both Kartikeya and Ganesha are sons of Shiva, meaning that the temple complex could have been dedicated to Shiva.

While identification at this stage is speculative, the presence of sculpted figures on the façade gives greater weight to this being a man-made structure.

The façade carvings on the Balochistan Sphinx-Temple could be that of Kartikeya and Ganesha.

The structure of the Sphinx-Temple suggests that it may actually be a Gopuram, i.e. the entrance tower of a temple. Like the Sphinx-Temple, gopurams are generally flat-topped. Gopurams have a row of ornamental kalasams (stone or metal pots) arranged on top. From careful study of the flat-topped Sphinx-Temple, one can discern a number of ‘spikes’ on top, which could be a row of kalasams, covered with sediment or termite mounds.

Gopurams are attached to the boundary wall of a temple, and the Sphinx-Temple appears to be contiguous with the outer boundary. Gopurams also feature giant sculpted figures of dvarapalas, i.e. door guardians; and as we have noted, the Sphinx-Temple appears to have two monumental figures carved on its façade, just above the entrance, which serve as the dvarapalas.

The Balochistan Sphinx-Temple could be a gopuram, i.e. an entrance tower of a temple.

An elevated structure to the left of the Sphinx-Temple could be another gopuram. This implies that there could be four gopurams in the cardinal directions leading to a central courtyard, where the main shrine of the temple complex was built (which cannot be seen in the photograph). This kind of temple architecture is quite common in South Indian Temples.

The Arunachaleshwar Temple in Tamil Nadu, India, has four gopurams i.e. entrance towers, in the cardinal directions. The temple complex houses numerous shrines. ©Adam Jones CC BY-SA 3.0.

The Sphinx-Temple Platform

The elevated platform on which the Sphinx and Temple are situated appears to have been elaborately carved with pillars, niches, and a symmetrical pattern that extends across the entire upper part of the platform. Some of the niches may well be doors that lead to chambers and halls under the Sphinx-Temple. It is believed by many, including mainstream Egyptologists like Mark Lehner, that there could be chambers and passages under the Great Sphinx of Giza as well. It is also interesting to note that the Balochistan Sphinx and the Sphinx-Temple are situated on an elevated platform, just as the Sphinx and the Pyramids of Egypt are built on the Giza plateau overlooking the city of Cairo.

Another conspicuous feature of this site is a series of steps leading to the elevated platform. The steps appear to be evenly spaced, and of uniform height. The entire site gives the impression of a grand, rock-cut, architectural complex, which has been eroded by the elements, and covered by layers of sediment, masking the more intricate details of the sculptures.

The Balochistan Sphinx-Temple Platform can be made out to have been carved with steps, pillars, niches and a symmetrical pattern.

Site Sedimentation

What could have deposited so much sediment on the site? The Makran coast of Balochistan is a seismically active zone, which frequently produces enormous tsunamis that obliterate entire villages. It has been reported that the earthquake of November 28 1945, with its epicentre off the coast of Makran, caused a tsunami with waves reaching as high as 13m in some places.8

Additionally, a number of mud volcanoes are strewn along the Makran coastline, some of which are located in the Hingol National Park, near the Hingol river delta.9 Intense earthquake activity triggers the volcanoes to erupt, spewing staggering amounts of mud, and drowning the surrounding landscape. Sometimes, mud volcano islands appear off the coast of Makran, in the Arabian Sea, which are dissipated by wave action within a year.10 The combined action of tsunamis, mud volcanoes and termite mounds may, therefore, be responsible for the build-up of sediment on the site.

View of Chandragup I Mud Volcano, Balochistan, from the base. ©Ahsan Mansoor Khan CC BY-SA 4.0.

Crater of a Hangol mud volcano. CC BY-SA 3.0.

Historical Context

An elaborate Indian temple complex on the Makran coast should not come as a surprise, for Makran had always been regarded by the Arab chroniclers as ‘the frontier of al-Hind.11 A-Biruni wrote that, “the coast of al-Hind begins with Tiz, the capital of Makran, and from there extends in a south-eastern direction….”12 Though the sovereignty of parts of the region alternated between Indian and Persian kings from very early times, it retained “an Indianised identity all along”.13 In the decades preceding the Muslim raids, Makran was under the dominion of a dynasty of Hindu kings, who had their capital at Alor in Sind.14

The term ‘Makran’ is sometimes taken to be a corruption of the Persian Maki-Khoran, meaning ‘fish-eaters’. But it is also thought that the name derives from a Dravidian toponymic ‘Makara’.15 When the Chinese pilgrim Hiuen Tsang visited Makran in the 7th century AD, he noted the script that was in use in Makran to be “much the same as that of India,” but the spoken language to have “differed a little from that of India”.16 Historian Andre Wink writes:

The same chiefdom of Armadil is referred to by Hiuen Tsang as ‘O-tien-p’o-chi-lo’, located at the high road running through Makran. He also describes it as predominantly Buddhist; thinly populated though it was, it had no less than 80 Buddhist convents with about 5000 monks. In effect at eighteen kilometres northwest of Las Bela at Gandakahar, near the ruins of an ancient town are the caves of Gondrani, and as their constructions show these caves were undoubtedly Buddhist. Traveling through the Kij valley further west (then under the government of Persia) Hiuen Tsang saw some 100 Buddhist monasteries and 6000 priests. He also saw several hundred Deva temples in this part of Makran, and in the town of Su-nu li-chi-shi-fa-lo – which is probably Qasrqand- he saw a temple of Maheshvara Deva, richly adorned and sculptured. There is thus very wide extension of Indian cultural forms in Makran in the seventh century, even in the period when it fell under Persian sovereignty. By comparison, in more recent times the last place of Hindu pilgrimage in Makran was Hinglaj, 256 km west of present day Karachi, in Las Bela.17

Thus, according to the accounts of Hiuen Tsang, the Makran coast was – even in the 7th century AD – dotted with hundreds of Buddhist monasteries and caves, as well as several hundred Hindu Temples, including a richly sculpted temple of Lord Shiva.

What happened to these caves, temples, and monasteries of the Makran coast? Why have they not been restored and brought into the public eye? Are they suffering the same fate as the Sphinx-Temple Complex? Probably so. Eroded by the elements and covered with sediment, these ancient monuments have either been entirely forgotten or are being passed off as natural formations.

Indeed, close to the Balochistan Sphinx, on top of an elevated platform, are the remnants of what appears to be another ancient Hindu-like temple, complete with the Mandapa, Shikhara (Vimana), pillars and niches.

An ancient Temple of Makran, with Vimana, Mandapa, pillars and niches.

How Old Are These Temples?

The Indus Valley Civilisation extended along the Makran coastline, and its westernmost archaeological site is known as the Sutkagen Dor, near the Iranian border. Some of the temples and rock-cut sculptures of the region, including the Sphinx-Temple Complex, could, therefore, have been built thousands of years ago, during the Indus Period (c. 3000 BCE), or earlier. It is possible that the site was built in phases, and that some of the structures are extremely old, and others comparatively recent. Dating rock-cut monuments is, however, difficult in the absence of inscriptions. If the site contains readable inscriptions that can be interpreted (another tricky proposition, since the Indus script has not yet yielded its secrets), then it may be possible to put a date on some of the monuments. In the absence of inscriptions, scientists will have to rely on datable artefacts/human remains, architectural styles, geological erosion patterns, and other clues, however.

One of the persistent mysteries of the Indian Civilisation is the profusion of exquisite rock-cut temples and monuments that were built from the 3rd century BCE onwards. How did the skills and techniques for building these sacred places of worship appear without a corresponding period of evolution? The rock-cut monuments of the Makran coastline may provide much-needed continuity between the architectural forms and techniques of the Indus period and the later-day Indian civilisation. It may have been on the mountains of the Makran coast that the Indus artisans honed and perfected their skills, which were later transported to the Indian civilisation.

The Indus Valley Civilisation included sites located along the Makran coast. Source:

Undoubtedly, there is a virtual treasure trove of archaeological wonders waiting to be discovered on the Makran coast of Balochistan. Unfortunately, these magnificent monuments, whose origins go back to unknown antiquity, continue to languish in isolation, thanks to the appalling level of apathy towards them. It appears that little attempt has been made to acknowledge or restore them, and the journalists routinely pass them off as ‘natural formations’. The situation can only be salvaged if international attention is drawn to these structures, and teams of archaeologists (as well as independent enthusiasts) from around the globe visit these enigmatic monuments to research, restore, and promote them.

The importance of these ancient monuments of the Makran coast can hardly be overstated. They could be of great antiquity, and provide us with important clues to uncover humanity’s mysterious past.


1 This is the general impression gained from reading blogs written by visitors. The first reports and images of the Balochistan Sphinx begun appearing after 2004, when people started visiting the Hingol National Park on day trips from Karachi.

2 See for example: A. Nelson, ‘13 natural rock formations that look man-made’, 19 Jul. 2016.

S. Malik, ‘Natural Featured Sphinx of Pakistan‘, 18 Dec. 2014.

3 New World Encyclopedia, ‘Sphinx’.

4 Theoi Project: Greek Mythology, ‘Sphinx‘.

5 R Deekshithar, ‘Sphinx of India, the Living Tradition‘.

Also see the YouTube Video: ‘Sphinxes of India’.

6 Raja Deekshithat, ‘Sphinx in Indian Art‘.

9 All Things Pakistan, ‘Mud Volcanoes of Balochistan‘.

11 Wink & Al-Hind, The Slave Kings and the Islamic Conquest, (BRILL, 1991) p. 132.

12 ibid.

13 ibid. p. 136

14 ibid. p. 133

15 ibid. p. 137

16 ibid.

17 ibid. 135.

About the author: Bibhu Dev Misra is a graduate of the Indian Institute of Technology and the Indian Institute of Management and has been working as an Information Technology consultant for more than 14 years. He is also an independent researcher and writer on topics related to ancient civilizations, myths, symbols, science and religion. His research has taken him to many places of historical interest across the globe. His articles have appeared in different journals, magazines, and websites including the New Dawn, Science to Sage, Comsomath, Viewzone, Esamskriti and others. He can be contacted at [email protected] and via his personal blog:

30 thoughts on “The Sphinx Of Balochistan: Is It A Man-made, Rock-cut, Architectural Marvel?”

  1. dago benavidez says:

    totally man made!!

  2. Brandy says:

    I wish someone in the field of archaeology or anthropology, whichever, would exam this site. It’s very interesting. I would love to know more about it.

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      My sentiments exactly! This site is sorely in need of a thorough scientific exploration. In fact, even a simple photographic survey of the entire site would reveal a lot of important details.

  3. Country Codger says:

    Wow! That was a fantastic article about something I had never heard of before. Thank you very much for taking the time and effort to research and write this article. If you receive more information or research on this site please remember my email.

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thanks for your words of appreciation. Please drop me an email at [email protected] and I will keep you updated if I receive any additional information about the site.

  4. Justin Lees says:

    No. Just no. There is nothing presented in this article which makes me believe to any extent that the geological feature in the article is any form of temple, sphinx, vimana, or anything else. Point 1; The picture of the highway, after the map, shows the same eroded strata as that the text is attempting to pass off as “niches, symmetric patterns”, but appears to be nothing more than the effects of natural phenomena on this particular landscape. Look at pictures of well-known geological features such as Monument Valley or the Grand Canyon to see how nature can create fantastic shapes, given the right conditions. Point 2; For these features to be artificial, but eroded, their age would have to be impossibly old- even by pre-diluvian standards! If one considers Dr Robert M Schoch, PhD’s analysis of the Egyptian sphinx r.e; the water erosion evidence, and his subsequent reconsideration of it’s period of existence, then the amount of erosion on THIS “complex” is magnitudes of order greater, and therefore it’s period of existence must be similarly great. While I accept the (albeit controversial) theory of an advanced ancient civilization (based on new arguments presented), the levels of erosion in this example, would place this “complex” so far back in pre-history as to be almost impossible for any civilization to have created it. We only have to look at other geological formations, and analyse other man-made rock structures which have been eroded, to come to the conclusion that these features, exotic as they may appear, are nothing more than natural, and, while I applaud people’s efforts to bring more evidence for a pre-diluvian civilization to the table, I honestly believe that in this case, they are mistaken. But in saying that; if anyone would care to sponsor a trip to the site, I would gladly take a closer look with an open mind, and try to determine whether this claim carries any weight.

    1. Michael G Langley, MD says:

      Have you not seen recent articles that show an ancient temple in Turkey that show it more than 10,000 years old? You are making your statement based on old information! There are many experts in the world proven to be wrong. In medicine the guy, that discovered a bacterial cause for peptic ulcers, was laughed out of the lecture hall, when he first presented it. HE WAS RIGHT! Your response might be considered arrogant, or pompous behavior, in the near future!

      1. Rene Sonse says:

        That is Gobekli Tepi you are referring to and it dates to a pre Flood era making it over 13k years old. See Graham Hancock’s YT videos on it. It is proof positive that human civilization is far older than that what is commonly taught and accepted.

  5. JA says:

    Very interesting but the research and effort put into this article is noteworthy as well!!

    As others have said, I hope to see more information come to light in the future about this enigma

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thanks for being appreciative of the article. I am hoping that the article will prompt archaeologists and researchers to visit the site and undertake a comprehensive survey.

  6. Mike says:

    Thanks, There’s also a sphinx on the Bucegi Mountains in Romania.

    But you probably already know…

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Yes, I am aware of the sphinx in Romania, but to be honest, I do not think that structure resembles a sphinx at all…

  7. TA says:

    Amazing! I loved looking at this! Humanity, or someone else was here earlier than we think. I wish we had more answers. I loved reading your ideas! Thanks for putting this out there!

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thanks for your response. Its great to know that you loved the article. The site is definitely very old, going by the high levels of erosion. However, the Makran coast is subject to high winds, tsunamis, mud volcanoes etc. and the rocks are supposedly soft sandstone. So, the structure may not be antediluvian and could have been built in the past 10,000 years. We will only know if archaeologists and geologists start exploring the place with all seriousness.

  8. Richard A McPike says:

    Is this architecture aligned to the cardinal points? Where does it sit in global latitude and longitudinal terms? Does it tie in with other architectural structures around the globe?

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      I dont know if the architecture is aligned to the cardinal points…someone needs to go there with a compass and take measurements. The sphinx is located in the Hingol National Park which is roughly 25.5 degrees N. This puts it nearly in the same latitude as Karnak / Luxor in Egypt i.e 25.6 degrees N, and possibly some other sites across the world.

      1. alka chawla says:

        I dont know if its safe to travel to balochistan , I wish some one could do to verify history , I suppose the governments have to agree for the joint venture .Just amazing work Misra ji…thx

        1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

          Thanks for your response Alka. I dont think its very risky to travel to this site in Balochistan since people from Karachi go to the Hingol National Park on day trips. Its a problem for Indians to go there since Pakistan does not issue tourists visas to Indians, unless you have family there (else I would have already booked my tickets). Official archaeological expeditions will require government permissions, but it should not be a big problem for independent researchers to explore the site, I believe.

  9. Marika Whitney says:

    How wonderfully new (although very old) and exciting! I’m amazed that I have never heard of this sphinx until now. Definitely needs more research. Wonder what Dr. Robert Schoch would conclude. I will look forward to future information on this. Thank you so much for bringing this amazing site to light.

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thanks for your comment. I do hope that Dr.Robert Schoch, Graham Hancock, and other researchers and archaeologists will explore the site and uncover much more interesting details about this fascinating site.

  10. Mario Buildreps says:

    Hi Bibhu Dev Misra,

    We were tipped to this site by Matt Boggs. Do you have the GPS coordinates of this?
    It’s possible we can date this site accurately if it complies with the method.

    You can take a look at the website:

    Best regards,


    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Hi Mario,
      The Sphinx is located in the Hingol National Park, and the co-ordinates of the park are 25.51° N, 65.52° E. I do not have exact information about the co-ordinates of the Sphinx-Temple complex itself, nor do I know the orientation of the site. Someone needs to go there and take exact measurements.

  11. Aja Keflund says:

    Very interesting, I agree wholeheartedly that a further photographic survey would be invaluable! At the absolute least, it’s a fascinating site that harkens to other natural phenomena like New Hampshire’s Old Man of the Mountain was (prior to its collapse); at best, a tremendous find worthy of a great deal more research. Thank you for sharing what you have, and I look forward to learning more about this site!

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts. From what I have seen till now, I think that a photographic survey will reveal sufficient details to establish it as a man-made site. Till now we have only seen pictures taken from the road-side. It would be an absolute thrill to walk up those stairs and take some close up shots.

  12. Scott says:

    See Michael Tellinger you tube video called
    200,000 year old levitation technology.
    Re evaluate yoni and lingam

  13. Abhijit Bhattacharya says:

    A very informative writing. Probably a very ancient cite of unknown civilization in lying under a veil of mystery. I want to know more about it. The writing is very informative, and I have enjoyed a lot. Want to known more about it. If possible, please provide more information. Thanks for the effort.

    1. Bibhu Dev Misra says:

      Thank you. I am happy to know that you found the article informative. I shall surely write more about this site, if I come across interesting information. You can connect with me on Facebook, where I generally share any new thoughts, ideas and articles.

  14. Heather says:

    Visited your site after watching Ancient Architects, Balochistan Sphinx. Thank you for your enthusiasm and thought provoking ideas. Posing new theories and ideas which often fly in the face of accepted and in some cases, outdated modes of thought is valiant. Sharing this information can, hopefully bring it to the attention of those who can support and promote your research. Take Gobekli Tepe for instance. Best wishes.

  15. Troy Peverall says:

    So why has there not been any further investigation?

  16. Travis Hinton says:

    From my own research it does seem that there are advanced lost civilizations that we have now lost knowledge of, however, this is a huge stretch to me. This article employs large amounts of circular reasoning, and much of the evidence provided is not evidence at all.

    “A closer look at the Balochistan Sphinx-Temple reveals clear evidence of pillars carved on a boundary wall. The temple entrance is visible behind a large pile-up of sediment or termite mounds. An elevated, sculpted, structure to the left of the entrance could be a subsidiary shrine. Overall, there can be little doubt that this a massive, man-made, rock-cut monument of great antiquity.”

    The so-called pillars are more likely to be a natural formation than they are pillars, and in no way is there evidence that they are pillars.

    It is also unfounded to state that the elevated structure to the left is sculpted. There is absolutely zero evidence for that claim, and to make the claim without even having visited the site in person is unfortunately laughable.

    Finally, to say that there is little doubt that this is a man-made structure is, again, not only laughable, but genuinely sad, to a fellow explorer of fringe (for now) archaeology.

    As a community, we should be doing better research than this. The evidence and conclusions stated here are just as weak as those claimed by the adherents of a more mainstream narrative. We can, and we should do better.

Comments are closed.