Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Re: "...its difficult for me to consider them a coincidence due to incorrect (I mean to a large degree) calculation on the part of SN."
--I don't follow what you mean. The different passageway measures you quote span a range of 0.38 degrees. My difference with Starry Night's obliquity calculation circa 12,000 BC is less than 0.3 degrees. Also as I explained in another post, the shaft itself has an angular spread greater than that.

Re: "Using my theory I find a descending passageway alignment with SN of 26.417°."
--That is unclear what you are referring to. Do you mean that your theory, employing Starry Night calculations of a star declination, predicts the shaft under the Pyramid should have an angle of 26.417 degrees? And because that is close to the quoted shaft angles you think Starry Night values must be exact without error? What if Starry Night corrected their calculations (as they have in the past) by some small amount, say 0.2 degrees? Are you indicating that would prove your theory false?

And that said, I caution against any theories that depend on such extreme accuracy at such extremely ancient dates. Whether my method (Berger, 1976), or whatever calculation method Starry Night uses, there is still going to be a standard error range, which we haven't even talked about yet, and which may be significant. Look at the standard error in the Delta T calculation that Starry Night uses, from NASA, it only goes back to 500 BC and the standard error in that is getting increasingly large at that time. As I noted, of the monument-star comparisons of that extremely ancient epoch, that I quote in Black Genesis, this Vega-to-Shaft calculation is the only one that could be significantly affected by an error of 0.3 degrees or less, and in Black Genesis I noted caution about the value.

Anyhow, it wouldn't hurt to chime into Starry Night's blog and ask them to reference their calculation for Earth's pole. If they think that their users are starting to think their calculations might be bogus, they will have incentive to publish their calculation method for Earth's pole. (As they recently published, and corrected, their calculation method for Delta T which is Earth's spin rate.)


Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Zep Tepi 466 loveritas 07-Mar-13 11:01
Re: Zep Tepi 296 PB Bytes 08-Mar-13 15:17
Re: Zep Tepi 291 loveritas 08-Mar-13 20:31
Mostly offline next couple of days 327 Thomas Brophy 08-Mar-13 23:57
Re: Mostly offline next couple of days 265 loveritas 09-Mar-13 00:34
Re:the waves of which dashed in powerless fury against its base. 303 Thunderbird 10-Mar-13 20:18
Nice To See You're Back 327 loveritas 12-Mar-13 04:22
Re: Nice To See You're Back 305 Thomas Brophy 16-Mar-13 04:52
GHMB 'Decorum' and Other Issues 301 Dr. Lew Graham 16-Mar-13 14:03
Re: GHMB 'Decorum' and Other Issues 302 Thomas Brophy 16-Mar-13 20:18
High on Ego 273 loveritas 16-Mar-13 21:59
and self righteous arrogance 306 Sirius7237 16-Mar-13 22:18
Re: GHMB 'Decorum' and Other Issues 327 Bobajot 17-Mar-13 02:15
Re: GHMB 'Decorum' and Other Issues 304 Aine 17-Mar-13 22:04
Relying Upon One's Discernment 351 Dr. Lew Graham 18-Mar-13 01:35
Re: Relying Upon One's Discernment 830 cladking 18-Mar-13 20:58
Atrophy of Discernment 339 Dr. Lew Graham 18-Mar-13 21:34
Re: Atrophy of Discernment 341 cladking 18-Mar-13 21:59
A Miracle? 319 Dr. Lew Graham 18-Mar-13 23:42
Accidently hit "quote" instead of post and failed to correct 326 cladking 19-Mar-13 00:20
Miracles? 285 Dr. Lew Graham 19-Mar-13 00:30
Re: A Miracle? 218 PB Bytes 19-Mar-13 00:47
Typo 322 Dr. Lew Graham 19-Mar-13 01:00
Sarcasm? 299 Sirius7237 19-Mar-13 03:04
More Hypocrisy 303 loveritas 19-Mar-13 05:32
Re: Typo 282 PB Bytes 19-Mar-13 03:26
yes, maybe thinking is not ultimate ground of being 294 Thomas Brophy 18-Mar-13 23:03
Re: yes, maybe thinking is not ultimate ground of being 308 cladking 19-Mar-13 02:16
I addressed your question on Zep Tepi, no? 292 Thomas Brophy 18-Mar-13 04:41
Re: I addressed your question on Zep Tepi, no? 307 loveritas 18-Mar-13 06:07
Re: I addressed your question on Zep Tepi, no? 374 Thomas Brophy 18-Mar-13 22:30
Re: I addressed your question on Zep Tepi, no? 341 loveritas 18-Mar-13 22:38
I'll Rephrase the Question 318 loveritas 19-Mar-13 20:42
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 313 Aine 19-Mar-13 21:37
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 316 loveritas 20-Mar-13 11:54
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 323 Thomas Brophy 20-Mar-13 17:47
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 331 Thunderbird 20-Mar-13 18:29
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 309 loveritas 20-Mar-13 21:33
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 301 Spiros 20-Mar-13 22:13
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 340 Laird Scranton 21-Mar-13 16:50
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 345 Spiros 21-Mar-13 19:16
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 335 Audrey 24-Mar-13 04:25
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 302 Thomas Brophy 24-Mar-13 06:10
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 265 loveritas 24-Mar-13 06:54
Starry Night Pro calculation still not clarified 350 Thomas Brophy 29-Mar-13 22:02
Re: Starry Night Pro calculation still not clarified 324 loveritas 30-Mar-13 02:05
Re: What if?...... 288 Thunderbird 30-Mar-13 20:56
Re: What if?...... 285 loveritas 30-Mar-13 23:55
Re: Zawiyet el-Aryan meridian observation shaft/Water clock 536 Thunderbird 31-Mar-13 03:37
Re: Zawiyet el-Aryan meridian observation shaft/Water clock 318 loveritas 31-Mar-13 07:56
Bond of Heaven and Earth 475 loveritas 01-Apr-13 01:25
Djed-raising ropes? 322 Thomas Brophy 01-Apr-13 01:40
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 331 loveritas 01-Apr-13 05:18
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 300 Thomas Brophy 01-Apr-13 06:47
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 324 loveritas 01-Apr-13 06:58
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 310 Thomas Brophy 01-Apr-13 07:05
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 294 loveritas 01-Apr-13 07:11
Re: Djed-raising ropes? 318 Thomas Brophy 01-Apr-13 07:24
Re: Ability....and transitions of time. 316 Thunderbird 01-Apr-13 23:19
Re: Ability....and transitions of time. 293 loveritas 01-Apr-13 23:53
Re: King and Queen Ascending/Descending 380 Thunderbird 02-Apr-13 20:07
Re: King and Queen Ascending/Descending 284 loveritas 02-Apr-13 22:37
Re: Bond of Heaven and Earth 340 Thunderbird 01-Apr-13 03:55
Some basics... 325 Thomas Brophy 31-Mar-13 00:16
Re: Starry Night Pro calculation still not clarified 330 Spiros 30-Mar-13 06:30
Help ask Starry Night 303 Thomas Brophy 31-Mar-13 00:58
Re: Help ask Starry Night 386 Spiros 31-Mar-13 17:58
Starry Night Pro 'fesses up to precession calculation errors 883 Thomas Brophy 02-Apr-13 19:29
Re: Starry Night Pro 'fesses up to precession calculation errors 368 Spiros 02-Apr-13 20:59
Re: Starry Night Pro 'fesses up to precession calculation errors 302 Thomas Brophy 02-Apr-13 21:22
Starry Night Pro precession calculation fix delayed 373 Thomas Brophy 10-May-13 22:39
Re: Starry Night Pro precession calculation fix delayed 325 loveritas 11-May-13 01:22
Re: Starry Night Pro precession calculation fix delayed 310 Spiros 13-May-13 22:10
What is your culminating declination? 306 Thomas Brophy 13-May-13 22:49
Re: What is your culminating declination? 292 Spiros 13-May-13 23:27
Re: What is your culminating declination? 315 Thomas Brophy 14-May-13 00:13
Re: What is your culminating declination? 265 Spiros 19-May-13 01:31
Re: I'll Rephrase the Question 396 Thomas Brophy 21-Mar-13 04:20
Einstein Not Necessary 296 loveritas 21-Mar-13 06:37
Memory & Einstein 293 loveritas 24-Mar-13 23:10
Re: Memory & Einstein 332 Thomas Brophy 24-Mar-13 23:43
Re: Zep Tepi 301 Eddie Larry 14-May-13 03:45
Re: Zep Tepi 312 Sirfiroth 15-May-13 02:15
Re: Zep Tepi 272 Eddie Larry 15-May-13 03:02


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.