> ... I think what Scott has finally given us in his RVT is a
> unified theory of Giza which fits the evidence far more
> convincingly than the increasingly threadbare "tombs theory". I
> think - deep down - that even you know he's onto something (but
> no need to admit it here!) ...
> Honestly you must be joking with this post. You shouldn't mock
> Scott like this.
I may (just maybe) be joking about lobo-hotei ever admitting or acknowedging anything of merit in any of Scott's theories... ever.
""It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair