> Well look, you are entitled to your opinion, just don't expect
> me to be open to your own views when you go completely off
> center by making personal derogatory remarks about my motives
> for writing this book, as if you think you know me and can
> therefore pigeonhole me. That says more about you than it does
> about me and that's not being objective. You are merely making
> rash judgements about us and what Scott and I are presenting
> based primarily on your negative attitude or feelings towards
> so-called "alternative" researchers. I think you need to get
> over yourself first and then perhaps we can interact
> respectfully and intelligently.
Perhaps you should take some of your own medicine/advice Gary. Again I was talking to/about Scott. IF you can't read that clearly then that is not on me. As for the rant about me and what you "think" you know about me... that paints you guilty of your own complaint.