SC: You attributed a value of over 50% probability that the geometric relationships I presented in my opening post were coincidence. That is not an "opinion".
I beg to differ. I should know - it is my opinion.
SC: It wasn't an opinion you expressed. It was a stated value of over 50%. And everyone here can see that. So, let's have your qulification of the stated value. What variables led you to a stated value (not opinion) of over 50%? Answer please.
Any time soon would be good.