SC: I don't do semantics. Go and waste someone else's time with them.
You are the one wasting our time by not doing semantics. You present your ideas as a theory - as something worth looking into - and then you admit that it is nothing but an unproven hypothesis. An opinion.
SC: 'The Giza Prophecy' presents a number of hypotheses all of which are testable and falsifiable. A collection of hypotheses is regarded as a theory, to wit:
Hypotheses are individual empirically testable conjectures; while theories are collections of hypotheses that are logically linked together into a coherent explanation of some aspect of reality and which have individually or jointly received some empirical support. - (Source)
Bringing all these various hypotheses together, we present the 'Recovery Vault Theory'.
MA: Well, you are entitled to it.
SC: I know.
SC: Oh my. Why is my gast not well and truly flabbered? You really think I expected a diehard, mainstream apologist to say anything else? As if.
MA: And here comes the name calling. Could not even resist it for the duration of your tenure as AoM.
SC: Dear, dear. Is that really the best you can do?