> with them.
You are the one wasting our time by not doing semantics. You present your ideas as a theory - as something worth looking into - and then you admit that it is nothing but an unproven hypothesis. An opinion.
Well, you are entitled to it.
> SC: Oh my. Why is my gast not well and truly flabbered? You
> really think I expected a diehard, mainstream apologist to say
> anything else? As if.
And here comes the name calling. Could not even resist it for the duration of your tenure as AoM.