> SC: With respect, but the "obstacle" is not removed. If you
> have "no idea" "how probable" the geometric relationships
> presented in this thread are likely to be the result of simple
> coincidence then you have no right to claim that they are.

As you have no right to claim, say, "in all probability" if you are not able to give us an excact figure for that probability? No probability-claims without figures in your book then?
Ups, the other foot just took one.

> So, you can either present your probability or, if as you now
> claim you "have no idea" of the probability then retract your
> statement.

You need to get over yourself.

Your original question was "how many here on GHMB consider the clear geometric relationships in the diagrams below to be the result of simple coincidence"?

I answered your question and now you demand that I "retract my statement"? Are you serious?

You are in no position to demand anything. What you CAN do, as one of the authors of the month, is answer relevant questions concerning the ideas you put forth.

Here is a relevant question:

Do we have any indication, other than "it looks right", that Menkaure sought to incorporate his site into a plan initiated by Khufu?

Or are we just dealing with yet another exercise in geometry?

Morten