And how do you dare to infer that they were meant to be square ? On what evidence is that based ?
Scott your whole theory rests on what you think they did. I would suggest you would get many more in your camp if you actually went with what was there and stop all this moving of stuff and explaining to us why The Ancient Builders did what they did. Seems to me every other sentence in the orthodox starts off ... "Well we think" or "probably" or "it might have been" or "it is reasonable to assume" ...
Sorry Scott you can move the goal post if you wish but you can't move the pyramids. As long as you keep trying to tell us you know what they did and why they did it without using what was there .... well anyone's theory can work if they change the distances and angles and line ups. Good Lord I could get my solar system to fit to perfection.
Just one question if you might.
G1 is 440 cubits (south side as per Petrie and G2 is 411.04 (south side as per Petrie) the ratio of these two is 1.070455430
Now the square root of 3 divided by Phi equals 1.0704662698
Accuracy is 99.998987 %
Intentional or not ?