Finally! Someone who 'gets' what we are saying and who is actually taking the time to look properly at what we are presenting. I thank you for that even though you have come to a different conclusion.
Actually I didn't come to a conclusion. The most I can say is; it's dam close. My problem is I'm a perfectionist. I've done a lot of this same thing, plotting the relationships of the monuments. And it's always dam close. And close hasn't been good enough to convince me, even in my own diagrams. That is why I haven't put any of them up on this board.
I guess I expect perfection in the layout because there is perfection in the pyramids themselves. To level a structure covering 13 acres within 1", and all the other details of perfection, makes me think; if they could do that, they certainly could have laid out the site with the same precision. It just doesn't follow that they would have been a little sloppy in the site plan.
Every time I've plotted something, it seems that G1 isn't completely square. I mean it seems to be off by more than the few inches Petrie and others measured. Have you run into this? Or it could just be the satellite images.Quote
These lines are not parallel and G1 and G2 are different sizes precisely because G3 is a rectangle as predicted by the GSF.