AS: Why would lining up the 3 pyramids along the strike of Giza stratigraphy be just a "happy coincidence" or "result of simple chance"? There is already a good geological/engineering reason why they might be lined up... so in that case it's not necessarily so random as one wishes to believe. Is there some reason why the pyramids' positions along those lines needs to be stars instead of just elbowroom spacing and visual esthetics?
SC: Are you deliberately "not getting this", Archae? The issue here concerns the clear inter-quarter geometric relationships between the main Gizamids and the queens. You could line up three pyramids along the strike of the plateau with slightly different sizes to the actual pyramids and you would completely fail to achieve these inter-quarter geometric relationships. Make G1 or G3 slightly bigger or smaller, make G1 or G3 slightly further east, west, north or south and the inter-quarter geometric relationship we observe today completely breaks down. So, do you consider the clear, geometric relationship we observe in these structures to be the result of a "happy concidence"? A simple yes or no will suffice.
Post Edited (18-Feb-12 18:24)