AS: I was on topic...... Why are the lines drawn on those images along a similar orientation as the strike of Giza stratigraphy..... just coincidence?
SC: With respect but you are attempting to bring into the discussion here the geology of the site. NOw whilst I do think that was an important consideration in the siting of the Gizamids, it is not what I am questioning.
Let me clarify for you. If G3 were ever so slightly larger or smaller, a slightly different shape or positioned ever so slightly east-west or north-south, the mid and inter-quarter gemoetric connection that it has with G1 in its present location and its present dimensions would be broken. So, I am asking - do you consider this obvious geometric relationship between G1 and G3 to be coincidence? Yes or no? It's not a trick question.
Post Edited (14-Feb-12 23:45)