AS: Why would these claimed advanced geologically minded 4th dynasty Egyptians or whatever, capable of predicting these evidence elusive earthshifts, not come to the conclusion that the Giza Plateau seemed to be quite prone to being flooded and severely eroded due to climate change..... specifically ones involving slightly warmer global temperatures than today? After all, they seem to be rather imaginative and hasty with their ability to make wide spanning and grandiose geologic claims that really do lack clear geological evidence that they actually occurred......
Is it just coincidence that the 3 pyramids at Giza are lined up along strike lines of Giza stratigraphy? And if so why would that necessarily need any planning considering that the others could just be doing what the first did......
SC: You ask a lot of questions. None of which are at all relevant to the question of the obvious geometric relationship between G1 and G3 demonstrated in the opening post of this thread.
So, to keep on topic - do you consider such a geometric relationship to be the result of simple coinicidence or do you consider that this had to have been planned?