DB: And I will repeat you have done no such thing. You have shown and proved absolutely nothing other than your slight of hand with a protractor, meaningless I might add, and a rectangle which you have still failed to show has any logical reason for being. You draw a rectangle but what is it based on ? it is almost ridiculous because it has no rhyme or reason.
Do explain to us why it gets larger as you turn a mysterious angle, but from what base line you do not tell us. It is totally without logic and reason.
In your diagrams you give the illusion that the bottom of the "rectangle" is parallel with your origin line but it can't be because the initial angle by your own words was 95 degrees.
And try as I might I have been unable to get a rectangle from your initial diagonal. Please show us how it is done in relation to the entire diagram
Post Edited (13-Feb-12 00:54)