Here is what Scott's diagram really looks like when drawn to scale ACCURATELY !.
Angle appears to be 5.3 so that would make the angle 95.3 degrees
Turning the angle to make the first soon to be diagonal vertical
As you can all see Scott has almost been dishonest with his diagram The fact that he is incapable of showing, like I have here, how his line was established shows once again that it can not be justified. The whole theory collapses.