SC: Because when I'm saying "square" with refernce to G3, I am simply meaning "box off the diagonal". I'm not saying "create a square". When you "box off" the G3 diagonal, you end up with a very slight rectangle.
Morten: Well, if you wrote what you meant we could perhaps avoid unnecessary confusion...
SC: Mia culpa! Glad it's clear for you now.
SC: Now, if I can use the Orion Belt stars to reverse-engineer these proportions that agree very well with the Gizamid proportions (as per the GPMP drawing), then there is absolutely ,nothing that could or would have prevented the AEs from following such a procedure to forward-engineering such a plan.
Morten: What an odd thing to say. So that something can be done is evidence for that it was done.
SC: Not necessarily so.
Morten: My point exactly.
SC: Mine too. Correlation sometimes isn't linked to a particular causation. But sometimes it actually is.
Morten: Again, why not write what you mean.
SC: I just did.
SC: However, 280 trillion to 1 suggests very strongly that it was done as described i.e. that there is a geometric association between the Gizamids and the Belt stars.
Morten: Please, do share your calculations.
SC: Why? What difference will it make to you? Tell me - what odds would satisfy you? The answer, I rather suspect, is that no amount of odds in my favour would remotely convince you of my argument since you have already made up your mind that the Gizamids are not geometrically linked to Orion's Belt and no amount of evidence/proof will convince you otherwise. Why waste my time?