> steps the planners would have followed to come up with the
And what we are served is "mirror B3" + "L3 misses G3b corner" + "place L3 through corner".
What is wrong with a little reverse engineering...
> So if as you say the G3 base was not planned to be
> square, then you have to explain, why was it not planned
> square, and what was the rectangle base ratio chosen to be and
> I don't see this info in your presentation.
No, he says "square L2". That should result in a square..?
> So how can anybody
> check to see if you are presenting works or not.