GO: You really haven't set any serious argument against it, but you are entitled to your opinion - always.
Morten: Just as you and Scott haven´t presented any evidence for your RVT, but you are entitled to your opinion - always.
SC: With respect, but the RVT is supported by the tens of thousands of artefacts recovered from the galleries of the Step Pyramid at Saqqara and also the large quantities of wheat and barley seed found here. The RVT Precession Timeline (utilising Orion's Belt) is also very well evidenced as a cursory glance at the Giza pyramids will easily show you.
Given this evidence, we see it as more than probable that the other pre-fifth dynasty pyramids once held such a cache of recovery goods.
SC: No MJ - the EVIDENCE I present in my forthcoming book will demonstrate “…the impossibility of the [pre-5th dynasty] pyramids being tombs…” Hawass and Co can believe what they like.
Morten: The deadline came and passed (the book did not). So... the evidence?
SC: With respect, Morten, but as I said in the opening post, we are not here to discuss the merits or otherwise of other alternative theories. We are here as Graham's AoM to present the evidence to support our own theory, to show how the various pieces of evidence from the pyramids and their curious idiosyncracies supports what we are arguing. We are arguing in favour of our theory. If you wish to argue in favour of the tomb theory, then this is not the time or place. The tomb theory has had more than enough exposure over the years and still has trouble convincing lots of people. Time to give others the floor.
EDIT: Fix typo.
Post Edited (04-Feb-12 10:24)