RAY: Scott is not trying to use this thread to debate the Dialogue
> > of Ipuur. He's trying to broadly present some basic concepts
> > from a book just released that few of us, if any, have yet
> > read.
MORT: The purpose of this thread is, to my understanding, to debate
> the RVT.
RAY: Houston, We've got a problem!
IMO, Mort, we can't debate "The Giza Prophecy" yet. At most we have a 2 page or so "teaser" introduction to a new "recovery vault" claim regarding the purpose of some ancient structures that include the three large pyramids at Giza. We still haven't nailed down the "what"? "when"? "where"? or "how many"?
Of course, that didn't stop Don from minutely critiqueing the Orion correlation part that would be in the just released Giza Prophecy book--leading to minute geometric calculations and discussions with knowledgeable contributers. Audrey also entered the Orion correlation fray, but she at least had the sound judgement to start a new thread.
You responded to an explanation offered by Scott to some basic exploratory questions from Pat. Your comments potentially moved us from exploring RVT to a comparison with tomb theory. It's like Scott stuck a cherry tree into the ground and you wanted to debate the color of the fruit that would be borne 10 years later with the fruit color from a plumb tree you've been harvesting continuously for 20 years already.
I'd like to read more detail and substance and less quibbling.
The information value of this thread so far could probably be accomplished in five or six posts. As I write this, we are already in the 80's without really knowing what anyone is writing about anymore.