"And why is my Joseph scenario in error and less credible than yours ?"
With all due respect Don, and as I wrote in an earlier post: I always knew that what Scott and I would be up against here, is not only the sceptical views of the more orthodox mainstream thinkers amongst us who also post here, but also the sceptical views of the 'alternative' thinkers and theorists that frequent these massageboards - many of whom we've long corresponded with in the past and who would naturally want to prove us wrong and also have an invested interest in downplaying the importance of what we have found, and really because of the personal views/theories that one feels should be equally acknowledged - many of which may even be threatened by what we are presenting in this new book. Its only natural I guess, but it has to be said, as well as the fact that Scott and I are in a far different situation here than other AoM's in the past, who do not frequent these messageboards and are on less familar terms with the posters here. All this should be taken into consideration and I'm just saying that Scott and I are very much aware of this and all things associated.
Post Edited (02-Feb-12 17:11)