EN: ...following the logical steps I discovered the measuring system, vortex based mathematics and a calender that points clearly to our time and points out cyclical catastrophes that connect with Orion, that's the connection I hinted to with Bauval's OT. I also follow the chain of custody of this hidden knowledge down through the ages tracking very specific geometry hidden in symbols, number and heraldry, way to many "coincidences",...
SC: This I find very interesting, Ed. I think you will find my own work (with co-author, Gary Osborn) of immense interest in this regard since it would seem we have found similar things. It will be interesting to compare notes when you have finished your e-book.
EN: I have this data and I will release some of it here in the forum. I'll put together a post working from the "intent" end of it showing what I have discovered going back to the basic geometry that lead me to it.
SC: Great. Be very happy to see it.
EN: I don't claim to have all the answers...
SC: No worries. No one has all the answers, Ed.
EN: I am merely trying to share this information with others who have the same interest, this isn't a contest for me, I am willing to take constructive criticism, I expected it and all I really want is to understand what the truth of our history really is, this isn't an ego thing for me, I don't have one.
SC: I think it is great that you are sharing your ideas here, Ed. Trust me - it's not an easy thing to do. You set yourself up as a target for everyone to shoot at - been there, wore the t-shirt, still have some pot-marks. But it is also a brave thing that you do. It is all too easy for the naysayers to snipe from the sidelines, critcising everything and contributing precisely nothing. Undoubtedly you will come acoss such individuals here before your spell as AoM is complete. Now I may well come over right now as being your harshest critic but I can equally become your staunchest ally if I am convinced by what you are telling us. But I do need to be convinced.
EN: I debated for quite a while whether to go public or just forget about it, still have that option too.
SC: I think you have done the right thing to be honest. There are people on this board who can seriously help you with resources etc, with asking awkward questions. If all that makes you think more, to seek other possibilities then that can only be a good thing imo.
EN...I want to add that this whole complex is encoded with multiple facets of information and I certainly don't claim my work is all of it.
SC: Here I do have to agree with you 100%. Multiple facets, multiple layers. And idea struck me yesterday about your theory which I am still mulling over in my head. If it works out then I think I will have perhaps found the intent I am seeking. I can't share this right now with you as I am still working it through myself but it would perhaps require you to approach your theory from a different angle (no pun intended). If what I am thinking works out, I shall let you know.
EN: I have found something here that I feel is very important for everyone who is interested to see, that's all, so give me a chance to do these things and I promise you after the dust settles you will see intent.
My time is very limited to post here and I would like to cover the things I just mentioned, so I'll get working on a post,
SC: No worries. Keep up the good work.