Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Ed Nightingale wrote:

<Here is the math for the Aaku-Meh or "Light Measure" W.A Budge

From the 3 interval of the fifth interval scale; (fifth interval= x1.5)
Starting from 128x1.5=192x1.5=288x1.5=432x1.5=648
Interval 3 288 to 432 interval = 432-288=144
Interval 3 value= 144 dividing that interval by 7 = 20.57142 the ROOT Cubit
Third and fourth "note" are 288 and 432 respectively
Fourth "note" squared (432x432)= 186624 the ROOT speed of light
ROOT cubit 20.57142 Inches to Feet 20.57142 divided by 12 = 1.7142857 ft
ROOT speed of light 186624 divided by ROOT Cubit 1.7142857 = 108864.001
108864.001 divided by the ROYAL 20.61818 = 5280.000 (ft/mile)
The ROYAL Cubit is dividing the 5th "note" 648 by 3.14285 (22/7)= 206.1818
Move the decimal point to 20.61818 the ROYAL Cubit
Also 432 divided by 21 = 20.57142 The ROOT Cubit
Also the GREAT YEAR "canonical to current rate of precession
25920 years - 144 =25776 years 25776 divided by 360 degrees = 71.6 yrs
71.6 years equal 1 degree of precession we experience currently>

Hi Ed,

You've obviously been doing some intense studying of these ancient systems and know quite a bit about their various interactive correlations as described here. In most cases, ancient astronomic values were derived from the Canonical EMC John Michell determined of 24,883.2 Mi. Circ. of the Earth. I have no problem with that as I've mentioned to Jacob on his post regarding the GP's measures and the Tropical Year topic on the Mysteries forum board. The only flaw I have found in John Michell's deliberations was his attempt to convert this Canonical system into something of a dynamic model of the Earth's proportions instead of what it is, a static generic Spherical model that doesn't correctly accomodate it's Oblate Spheroid parameters. You've mentioned the Platonic Lamda series value 2187 or 3e7, already in another context, and this value does appear in the adjustment process of the Canonical Precession Year value of 25,920 yrs. which is in ratio to the Canonical EMC as 25/24. A well known metrologic conversion value as John Neal and Michell correctly noted between the ancient Roman and Greek Ft. units.

Most folks are content to see this 25,920 value as being of paramount relevance, but it can be derived by other means also. The ancient Vedic Naksatra system which also covers the ancient Oriental Lunar Mansions system 28 and 27 divisions of the heavens works together to generate this value as follows. 28/27 x 25,000 yrs. = 25,925.925cyc. yrs., adjusted by the ratio 4374/4375 = 25,920 yrs. 4374 being twice 2187 in the Platonic Lambda series. The more correct value according to todays measurements are as you mentioned 25,776 yrs. which is according to the same ancient system, the ratio 33/32 x 25,000 yrs. = 25,781.25 yrs. This figure which is just a tad different, is the simplified version of the Saros cycle or Nodes of the Dragon in astrologic lore, otherwise known as the cycle of the Moon's orbital parameters around the Earth that determines eclipse cycles. In other words, a Tropical Year of 365.2425 days as per the Gregorian calender x 33/32 = 354.174545cyc. days / 12 = 29.514545cyc. days per Synodic Month.

Although this value is slightly off the current known value of 29.5307 days, it is still accurate enough for the intercalary adjustment process. Both of these ratio factors of 28/27 and 33/32 work together to generate an accurate measure of the precessional parameters which as most know, is due to the Oblate Spheroid shape of the Earth, and the gravitational torque that is mostly applied by the Sun and Moon's pull on it. When factored together they create another ratio of either 77/72 or 385/360. This is how the correct figures were obtained for the system that was actually known by the AE's. Note the base 7 and 11 units here, as well as the Canonical duodecimal 12's units. This is somewhat absent in JM's Canonical system except for the one common denominator factor of 7920 En. Mi. Earth diameter in both systems which has the 11 and 12 factors present.

So before I continue any further, I would like to know if you are comprehending this discussion so far, if you would care to find out more.

Best regards,

Stephen W. Dail

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Accuracy of Measurements 191 Edward Nightingale 06-Mar-11 03:00
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 131 Scott Creighton 06-Mar-11 19:32
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 132 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 00:27
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 139 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 00:44
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 146 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 02:08
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 113 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 03:09
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 142 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 03:26
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 158 Dr. Troglodyte 07-Mar-11 16:48
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 130 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 17:10
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 139 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 17:37
History and Update 149 Dr. Troglodyte 10-Mar-11 19:00
Re: History and Update 130 Laird Scranton 10-Mar-11 19:56
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 133 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 10:23
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 102 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 15:25
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 132 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 15:44
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 145 lobo-hotei 07-Mar-11 16:11
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 96 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 17:59
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 95 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 18:16
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 95 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 19:08
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 137 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 21:31
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 135 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 23:43
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 135 Laird Scranton 08-Mar-11 02:39
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 131 lobo-hotei 08-Mar-11 00:19
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 121 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-11 23:38
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 145 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 14:58
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 129 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-11 15:00
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 97 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 16:10
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 136 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-11 16:33
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 134 Ahatmose 09-Mar-11 16:37
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 136 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-11 16:39
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 144 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 16:38
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 137 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-11 16:42
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 144 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 16:50
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 96 Ahatmose 09-Mar-11 16:53
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 97 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 17:18
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 138 Ahatmose 09-Mar-11 17:40
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 138 carolb 09-Mar-11 19:05
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 142 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 20:15
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 144 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 20:17
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 127 carolb 09-Mar-11 20:27
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 99 lobo-hotei 09-Mar-11 21:01
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 116 carolb 09-Mar-11 21:27
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 153 lobo-hotei 10-Mar-11 01:05
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 147 carolb 10-Mar-11 01:09
Mod Warning 204 lukehancock 10-Mar-11 07:51
Re: Mod Warning 142 lobo-hotei 10-Mar-11 15:11
Re: Mod Warning 159 lobo-hotei 10-Mar-11 15:14
Re: Mod Warning 201 lukehancock 10-Mar-11 16:59
Re: Mod Warning 105 lobo-hotei 10-Mar-11 19:35
earlier request also 123 lobo-hotei 10-Mar-11 19:46
Mod Note to Scott & Lobo 191 lukehancock 11-Mar-11 08:33
Re: Mod Note to Scott & Lobo 105 lobo-hotei 11-Mar-11 17:22
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 144 Lee Burton 07-Mar-11 19:07
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 162 Edward Nightingale 06-Mar-11 22:24
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 186 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 00:40
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 240 magisterchessmutt 07-Mar-11 17:54
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 165 Edward Nightingale 07-Mar-11 06:54
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 143 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 11:06
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 142 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 15:52
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 113 Laird Scranton 07-Mar-11 15:53
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 135 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 18:11
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 148 Edward Nightingale 07-Mar-11 15:48
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 167 Scott Creighton 07-Mar-11 19:05
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 91 magisterchessmutt 07-Mar-11 19:57
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 88 Edward Nightingale 07-Mar-11 16:02
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 138 Edward Nightingale 07-Mar-11 16:24
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 135 Edward Nightingale 08-Mar-11 03:22
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 135 Scott Creighton 08-Mar-11 16:08
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 136 Edward Nightingale 09-Mar-11 01:11
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 134 Scott Creighton 09-Mar-11 09:54
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 138 laughin 09-Mar-11 18:38
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 112 Scott Creighton 10-Mar-11 17:41
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 92 Scott Creighton 10-Mar-11 18:03
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 136 Edward Nightingale 10-Mar-11 23:46
Where or where did the erroneous images go ? 137 Ahatmose 11-Mar-11 00:31
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 144 Scott Creighton 11-Mar-11 00:33
Re: The Accuracy of Measurements 150 Edward Nightingale 11-Mar-11 03:11


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.