Author of the Month :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums

Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world.

Hi Scott,

I just posted a few more graphics for you and the others to critique, some of them might answer your question but I will address them here for you.

Scott quote

1) If you believe part of the "message" to be the measuring system, why build so many structures? The Great Pyramid of Khufu clearly exhibits such mathematical knowledge as pi, phi and Pythagorean geometry all on its own. Why would they need other structures? Indeed, you acknowledge yourself that the accuracy declined over time from G1 to G3. If presenting (or preserving) a "measuring system" surely one would have thought that accuracy would have been of paramount importance across the entire plan in order to ensure that the system is recoverable? Arguing that the structures were built to preserve a "measuring system" is somewhat contradicted as an objective, imo, given the apparent inaccuracies in your scheme.

Ed

As I tried to explain although the accuracy has declined in the construction the original design or theme, part of which is the measuring system can still be figured out by accounting for the +- inaccuracies of the actual building, it is still accurate enough to follow the encoded theme if you are aware of the theme.

Scott quote

2) What is the purpose of the various chambers of the 9 pyramids within your "unified sit plan"?

Ed

I can't say for certain although I do have my thoughts on that which I will keep to myself and wait to see where the real data leads me. I will state that this is a multifaceted design and I'm certain there are many things I have not found. This is ongoing research and I am willing to take ALL new information in and adjust this theory accordingly, and I am very sincere in that statement.

Scott quote

3) You seem to infer in your post here that the Royal Cubit is related to the Speed of Light. Are you suggesting that the designer's knew this and deliberately devised their Royal Cubit accordingly? Tell me that you are not suggesting the AEs understood the speed of light?

Ed

Here is the math for the Aaku-Meh or "Light Measure" W.A Budge

From the 3 interval of the fifth interval scale; (fifth interval= x1.5)

Starting from 128x1.5=192x1.5=288x1.5=432x1.5=648

Interval 3 288 to 432 interval = 432-288=144

Interval 3 value= 144 dividing that interval by 7 = 20.57142 the ROOT Cubit

Third and fourth "note" are 288 and 432 respectively

Fourth "note" squared (432x432)= 186624 the ROOT speed of light

ROOT cubit 20.57142 Inches to Feet 20.57142 divided by 12 = 1.7142857 ft

ROOT speed of light 186624 divided by ROOT Cubit 1.7142857 = 108864.001

108864.001 divided by the ROYAL 20.61818 = 5280.000 (ft/mile)

The ROYAL Cubit is dividing the 5th "note" 648 by 3.14285 (22/7)= 206.1818

Move the decimal point to 20.61818 the ROYAL Cubit

Also 432 divided by 21 = 20.57142 The ROOT Cubit

Also the GREAT YEAR "canonical to current rate of precession

25920 years - 144 =25776 years 25776 divided by 360 degrees = 71.6 yrs

71.6 years equal 1 degree of precession we experience currently

Aakhu t Khufu "Light Abode of Khufu W.A Budge

I am saying that whoever designed this blueprint was most definitely was aware of the speed of light, and that is all I have to say about that, anyone suggesting I am saying anything else needs to read that again, "whoever designed this blueprint", period..

Scott quote

4) You say in this post here, that "Bauval's theory is a major part of this multifaceted complex and is the astronomical part if it. I have found evidence that fits with his theory." What evidence and in what way does it fit with the OCT?

Ed

I am working on a calender I found encoded that I believe will include Orion as a major part of it, I have actually contacted Robert about this and hope to discuss this with him and Graham as well. It is not complete, I have the geometry and math and I am awaiting assistance on the star chart data. That is about all I can say at this point but be assured when and IF the star chart data confirms my math and geometry I will publish it.

I hope I answered your questions they were very good ones.

Thanks,

Ed

I just posted a few more graphics for you and the others to critique, some of them might answer your question but I will address them here for you.

Scott quote

1) If you believe part of the "message" to be the measuring system, why build so many structures? The Great Pyramid of Khufu clearly exhibits such mathematical knowledge as pi, phi and Pythagorean geometry all on its own. Why would they need other structures? Indeed, you acknowledge yourself that the accuracy declined over time from G1 to G3. If presenting (or preserving) a "measuring system" surely one would have thought that accuracy would have been of paramount importance across the entire plan in order to ensure that the system is recoverable? Arguing that the structures were built to preserve a "measuring system" is somewhat contradicted as an objective, imo, given the apparent inaccuracies in your scheme.

Ed

As I tried to explain although the accuracy has declined in the construction the original design or theme, part of which is the measuring system can still be figured out by accounting for the +- inaccuracies of the actual building, it is still accurate enough to follow the encoded theme if you are aware of the theme.

Scott quote

2) What is the purpose of the various chambers of the 9 pyramids within your "unified sit plan"?

Ed

I can't say for certain although I do have my thoughts on that which I will keep to myself and wait to see where the real data leads me. I will state that this is a multifaceted design and I'm certain there are many things I have not found. This is ongoing research and I am willing to take ALL new information in and adjust this theory accordingly, and I am very sincere in that statement.

Scott quote

3) You seem to infer in your post here that the Royal Cubit is related to the Speed of Light. Are you suggesting that the designer's knew this and deliberately devised their Royal Cubit accordingly? Tell me that you are not suggesting the AEs understood the speed of light?

Ed

Here is the math for the Aaku-Meh or "Light Measure" W.A Budge

From the 3 interval of the fifth interval scale; (fifth interval= x1.5)

Starting from 128x1.5=192x1.5=288x1.5=432x1.5=648

Interval 3 288 to 432 interval = 432-288=144

Interval 3 value= 144 dividing that interval by 7 = 20.57142 the ROOT Cubit

Third and fourth "note" are 288 and 432 respectively

Fourth "note" squared (432x432)= 186624 the ROOT speed of light

ROOT cubit 20.57142 Inches to Feet 20.57142 divided by 12 = 1.7142857 ft

ROOT speed of light 186624 divided by ROOT Cubit 1.7142857 = 108864.001

108864.001 divided by the ROYAL 20.61818 = 5280.000 (ft/mile)

The ROYAL Cubit is dividing the 5th "note" 648 by 3.14285 (22/7)= 206.1818

Move the decimal point to 20.61818 the ROYAL Cubit

Also 432 divided by 21 = 20.57142 The ROOT Cubit

Also the GREAT YEAR "canonical to current rate of precession

25920 years - 144 =25776 years 25776 divided by 360 degrees = 71.6 yrs

71.6 years equal 1 degree of precession we experience currently

Aakhu t Khufu "Light Abode of Khufu W.A Budge

I am saying that whoever designed this blueprint was most definitely was aware of the speed of light, and that is all I have to say about that, anyone suggesting I am saying anything else needs to read that again, "whoever designed this blueprint", period..

Scott quote

4) You say in this post here, that "Bauval's theory is a major part of this multifaceted complex and is the astronomical part if it. I have found evidence that fits with his theory." What evidence and in what way does it fit with the OCT?

Ed

I am working on a calender I found encoded that I believe will include Orion as a major part of it, I have actually contacted Robert about this and hope to discuss this with him and Graham as well. It is not complete, I have the geometry and math and I am awaiting assistance on the star chart data. That is about all I can say at this point but be assured when and IF the star chart data confirms my math and geometry I will publish it.

I hope I answered your questions they were very good ones.

Thanks,

Ed

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.