Your imagery; horakhty, is distorted to make your theory appear to work. I have previous explained this to you though you seem to be ignoring it. You also seem to be ignoring the fact that your 3 star asterism is so large in the sky that it's discrepancy from the actual angular offset of the Giza pyramids consititues an astronomical distance equal to this:
The amount of error your theory contains definitively invalidates it, it could have been done freehand without measuring any stars by any method whatsoever and still be much closer match to the pyramids then what your proposing. It's because your three stars cover an area of the sky 13.5 times that of Orion. I've already explained this all to in detail in your North Sky Correlation thread on the Mysteries board; in posts like this one, - this one - and even prior to your writing the post to which I'm replying now here.