DB: But if this is so would Richard not have found proof of this ?
SC: Proof of a cover-up? But couldn't part of that cover-up be DELIBERATELY faked photos that have been deliberatley faked so badly (e.g. camera crosshairs not even level) in order that we would see that they had been faked? We would then ask, "Why have these photos been faked?" And the obvious conclusion most would jump to is that we didn't in fact go to the moon (and this may be precisely what NASA is actually hoping for). At the very least they will have created enough doubt in people's mind that any astounding discovery that may be presented in the future by others (such as RCH) will be 'discredited' before their book even hits the bookstores - how could it possibly be true if we didn't even go to the moon?
But you have to ask yourself - why would NASA weave such an elaborate piece of disinformation? What are they really hiding?