> Have you READ "Dark Mission?"
No I haven't Richard
> The detailed answers to your very important POLITICAL question
> -- because the entire "we never went to the Moon" hoax is, in
> fact, THE "clever political disinformation" on this entire
> issue ... to try to HIDE what's REALLY on the Moon -- are
> carefully and exhaustively documented in the book .... :)
Curious how you managed to "carefully and exhaustively document all these theories" in the book when one would think these theories would need a book themselves to examine all the possibilities.
Calling those who would suggest we never went to the moon as hoaxters is quite interesting but does not wash at least with me for I am surely not part of this alleged disinformation onslaught
> Now -- WHY are "giant, glass-like structures," constructed by
> "somone" on the Moon, "impossible?"
> Because YOU don't know how to build them .... :)
Actually I never said they were impossible ... just preposterpous to believe they are there now.
> NASA itself, in its own "future lunar basing studies," has
> proposed creating NASA bases on the Moon MADE OUT OF GLASS
> (because most of the confirmed lunar surface composition IS
> "glass" -- ordinary "silicon dioxide"); the specific technical
> studies on these bases are cited in "the book" .... :)
> Or, is it the sheer SCALE that "bothers" you ...?
The thing that bothers me is suggesting that a) "aliens" existed b) and if they ever existed suggesting they built structures we would recognize as highrises.
> Remember: in less than five hundred years, humans have gone
> from the wooden boats that Columbus used to locate the
> Americas, averaging around 75 feet long and displacing an
> average ~100 tons ... to steel alloy "super tankers" ... some
> measuring over 1500 feet long (that's over of a quarter of a
> MILE!) ... and displacing over HALF A MILLION TONS!
> And, that's for MOVING transportation systems.
> Static buildings (the latest skyscrapers in the oil-rich
> countries, like the United Arab Emirates ...) are being built
> almost HALF A MILE in height -- and under one Earth "g" ... and
> ... on a planet which is also known for "pesky hurricanes."
> What could be accomplished on the Moon, WITHOUT an atmosphere
> (or major "moonquakes") -- with a structural material (glass)
> which, in a lunar VACUUM, is (measured) as "twenty times
> STRONGER" than alloy steel ...?
> It's "just" technology .... :)
> So, what we're seeing on the Moon is NOT "impossible" ... to a
> sufficiently advanced technology, and even HUMAN culture ... in
> another "couple hundred years."
> Or -- is your REAL "sticking point" the fact ... that it's NOT
> "ours?" :)
You can place all the smilies you wish Richard to try and detract from the points suggested. It is obviously a polished and well honed system you have developed over many years of having to defend your theories.
But to me it will always be ... so much wishful thinking sprinkled with just a dash of exaggeration.
To suggest NASA was sloppy enough to leave behind residue images of highrise glass buildings in their official photographs is to me laughable.
And finally Richard if you really had stumbled onto some of these truths that NASA and The CIA did not want you or the world to know about it is my reasoned and studied opinion that you would not be allowed to tell us about it.