Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Tom,

In my view, reincarnation exists or it does not. Not much differenent than the sun rising each day. The sun shines on all regardless of their moral character; it does not differentiate. Now the intellect might ask - What is the justice of this? The answer is that it just is.

If you assume nothing is static then each person can go up or down or a mixture of both in any one lifetime.

The issue of not remembering is profound. Suppose you could remember. Now overlay that on all of the issues within the physical, emotional and mental aspects from the acculturation of this lifetime. It is a blessing that most people cannot recall. Most people are challenged just dealing with the good, bad and indifferent of this lifetime. Only the more purified with good phsical constitutions are really suited to handle multilpe lives superimposing in this lifetime.

Couple these problems with the fact we life in H2O based living tissue bodies. A good analogy is someone going underwater and trying to discern what someone out of the water is saying. In other words, the messages are blocked or garbled or on the other side, the perception looking up is blocked by the cloud (moisture) cover that hides the Sun/Son.

One answer to the question of why people are not more evolved if they have lived multiple times in the physical is that it is easy to get dazed and confused existing consciously and usually less than consciously where the flux of duality obscures the inner reality. Plato's analogy of the cave sums this up pretty well.

As was said in Egypt (paraphrased): I am Isis, no mortal man has ever seen me unveiled. To get to the evolutionary state you postulate, one has to transcend their mortal nature while maintaining a physical body.

Thanks for participating in this forum.

Richard

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Tom Harpur is now online 1085 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:03
Wine symbolism 616 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 19:28
Re: Wine symbolism 424 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 19:50
Re: Wine symbolism 473 wireloop 20-Jul-04 21:20
& bread 369 michael saunders 20-Jul-04 21:28
Re: & bread 379 wireloop 20-Jul-04 22:09
Re: & bread 423 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:44
Re: & bread 373 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:43
Re: Wine symbolism 378 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:38
Welcome Tom Harpur 458 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 419 Graham Hancock 21-Jul-04 22:50
Re: Welcome Tom Harpur 486 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:01
A general template or not? 373 Kees 20-Jul-04 19:51
Re: A general template or not? 345 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:02
Re: A general template or not? 331 Kees 20-Jul-04 20:23
Re: A general template or not? 319 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:48
Re: A general template or not? 343 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:52
Re: A general template or not? 467 banah 24-Jul-04 11:51
Re: A general template or not? 475 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: A general template or not? 361 wireloop 20-Jul-04 23:37
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 363 Cross 20-Jul-04 20:20
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 376 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 20:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 344 Cross 21-Jul-04 02:48
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 376 Bill Barrington 21-Jul-04 12:13
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 310 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 16:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 311 wireloop 20-Jul-04 20:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 356 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:01
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 391 Jaimi2 20-Jul-04 21:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 414 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:26
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 357 Milo 20-Jul-04 21:40
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 354 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 21:51
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 345 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 363 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 351 Milo 20-Jul-04 22:46
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 346 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 22:55
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 359 Milo 20-Jul-04 23:08
Glitch in GHMB, do not reply here 326 Anonymous User 21-Jul-04 01:29
Rob.... 396 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 02:32
Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 369 Kees 20-Jul-04 22:27
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 359 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:04
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 362 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 20:53
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 348 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:44
Re: Incarnation versus Re-incarnation 598 Peter Novak 28-Jul-04 17:52
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 364 Tom Harpur 20-Jul-04 23:06
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 398 Kees 20-Jul-04 23:08
Massey and Orion 342 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 03:06
Re: Massey and Orion 359 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 443 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:27
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 425 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 359 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:46
Welcome back Tom Harpur 384 Kees 21-Jul-04 18:37
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 343 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 18:43
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 342 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 18:49
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 454 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:01
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 389 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 298 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:29
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 466 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:40
Re: Welcome back Tom Harpur 298 wireloop 21-Jul-04 19:52
KRST and anti KRST 535 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:20
Re: KRST and anti KRST 472 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:28
Re: KRST and anti KRST 420 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: KRST and anti KRST 364 Jaimi2 21-Jul-04 19:46
Re: KRST and anti KRST 373 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:58
Re: KRST and anti KRST 375 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:52
Re: KRST and anti KRST 426 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:05
Re: KRST and anti KRST 328 turnofthetide 21-Jul-04 21:06
Re: KRST and anti KRST 397 Kees 21-Jul-04 21:15
Re: KRST and anti KRST 314 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:43
any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 348 JimLewandowski 21-Jul-04 18:57
Re: any opinion/knowledge re: Alan Alford's symbolism 385 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:14
Where are all our regular literalists?? 357 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:29
I'd love to debate..... 345 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 19:33
Re: I'd love to debate..... 399 Kees 21-Jul-04 19:38
Re: I'd love to debate..... 345 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:12
Re: I'd love to debate..... 478 Kees 21-Jul-04 20:18
Re: I'd love to debate..... 296 wireloop 21-Jul-04 20:45
Re: I'd love to debate..... 360 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 19:56
Re: I'd love to debate..... 356 michael saunders 21-Jul-04 20:09
Re: I'd love to debate..... 329 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:26
Re: I'd love to debate..... 366 michael saunders 22-Jul-04 10:19
Re: I'd love to debate..... 332 Broker 22-Jul-04 22:20
Re: I'd love to debate..... 377 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 12:50
Re: I'd love to debate..... 436 michael saunders 23-Jul-04 18:23
Re: I'd love to debate..... 321 Anne-Marie 23-Jul-04 23:17
Re: I'd love to debate..... 318 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 01:50
Re: Where are all our regular literalists?? 348 Anne-Marie 21-Jul-04 22:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 292 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 19:45
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 358 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:04
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 382 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 20:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 357 Tom Harpur 21-Jul-04 20:29
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 392 Maria KA 21-Jul-04 21:02
Helios 451 Jaimi2 22-Jul-04 03:15
Re: Helios 316 wireloop 22-Jul-04 22:05
Re: Helios 381 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 02:06
Re: Helios 471 Anne-Marie 24-Jul-04 14:58
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 365 wireloop 24-Jul-04 04:24
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 390 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:11
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 359 wireloop 24-Jul-04 19:34
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 427 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:36
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 361 banah 24-Jul-04 12:15
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 348 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 19:21
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 362 banah 24-Jul-04 21:25
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 338 Tom Harpur 24-Jul-04 21:32
Re: Tom Harpur is now online 354 banah 24-Jul-04 21:41
And Genesis 6:4 will supply your answer 407 JimLewandowski 24-Jul-04 21:40


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.