Susan Doris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>

Quote

I'm open to almost anything but random
> based models.

But that is because, unless
> you can provide evidence to the contrary, you
> personally need to leave a gap in which to insert
> your personal epistemology/faith belief.
>
> Susan
>
> Ray

Ray is saying that random explanations totally suck in certain instances. When this occur, randomness must be disregarded as a viable explanation, even if an alternative explanation is not provided. It's what scientists do all the time.