Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello Bruce,
I simply do not understand what you mean by the sentence: "the organism does not change with modification to the information (DNA code)." To someone who has twenty years of experience working with mutation research like myself this is news as well as the claim that this would be scientific certainty. What do you mean to say? I do not follow.

I also think it is essentially hairsplitting (while factually true) to point out that there may be some anomalous animal with 10,000 or 30,000 genes, since as you can see all significant model animals including the human being fall within a narrow range close to 20,000 genes. This is consistent with the view that DNA codes for proteins, but has nothing to do with the instructions for the anatomy or morphology of an animal.


The point is that taken at face value the whole neo-Darwinist paradigm falls flat by a comparison of the G-values of different organisms, since obviously the human being is a much more complex organism than a nematode (I would say at least three orders of magnitude, but if you include mental properties it would certainly be more). It is a fact that before the human genome was sequenced a common estimate of its number of genes would be in the range of half a million and it turned out to be less than that of a nematode. But for those that want to cover up the failure of this prediction the best way out is to say that we should not look upon the number of genes but the entire genome. Yet, there is no evidence that this would hold true. It is just a last ditch attempt to keep the neo-Darwinist paradigm in existence. 20,000 genes holds the same amount of information regardless of how the genome is viewed.
But since most biologists are not aware that there is anything but the DNA that could provide instructions as to the body plan of an organism they will do everything to defend this view. I do think there is an increasing view that the DNA is modified by the cells, but you may be right that it is a small group. If you are interested in studying the alternative extensive theory including the creation waves I would have to refer you to my books either The Purposeful Universe or Quantum science of Psychedelics. Unfortunately, these are not matters that can be covered with a short note but requires the recognition of a multidimensional reality. Certainly, I would have hoped that you would have been more interested in discussing the remarkable meaning of the 780,000 year old date, but that was not the case.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 871 Graham Hancock 03-Jul-20 16:37
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 231 Bruce R. Fenton 03-Jul-20 23:00
a space oddity? 201 jazzmumbles 12-Jul-20 01:14
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 206 cjcalleman 14-Jul-20 03:55
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 198 Susan Doris 14-Jul-20 05:49
Great Post! 202 drrayeye 14-Jul-20 13:00
Re: Great Post! 187 cjcalleman 14-Jul-20 16:22
Re: Great Post! 185 drrayeye 14-Jul-20 17:50
Re: Great Post! 190 cjcalleman 14-Jul-20 17:56
Exactly what I was looking for 177 drrayeye 14-Jul-20 18:37
Re: Exactly what I was looking for 177 cjcalleman 14-Jul-20 18:41
Mod Note > Posting Images 184 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Jul-20 19:35
Could you post the image here 173 drrayeye 15-Jul-20 07:38
Re: Could you post the image here 174 cjcalleman 15-Jul-20 13:39
Re: Could you post the image here 174 drrayeye 15-Jul-20 15:42
Re: Could you post the image here 175 cjcalleman 15-Jul-20 15:51
Re: Great Post! 188 Susan Doris 15-Jul-20 06:15
Re: Great Post! 247 PB Bytes 15-Jul-20 20:15
Re: Great Post! 192 Susan Doris 16-Jul-20 05:38
Re: Great Post! -NOT! 213 greengirl5 16-Jul-20 23:33
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 228 Bruce R. Fenton 21-Jul-20 00:49
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 202 Susan Doris 21-Jul-20 07:19
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 179 cjcalleman 21-Jul-20 13:55
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 171 Susan Doris 21-Jul-20 15:31
Lost again 177 drrayeye 21-Jul-20 19:59
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 172 cjcalleman 21-Jul-20 15:26
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 171 PB Bytes 21-Jul-20 15:30
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 163 cjcalleman 21-Jul-20 15:46
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 169 PB Bytes 21-Jul-20 16:03
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 153 PB Bytes 28-Jul-20 14:29
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 162 cjcalleman 28-Jul-20 15:25
You're in luck 164 drrayeye 28-Jul-20 17:53
Re: You're in luck 178 cjcalleman 28-Jul-20 18:13
Re: You're in luck 161 Susan Doris 29-Jul-20 05:47
NOPE 156 drrayeye 29-Jul-20 16:35
Different but relatable interest 155 drrayeye 30-Jul-20 03:32
On holonomic brain theory 158 drrayeye 28-Jul-20 18:35
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 159 PB Bytes 28-Jul-20 20:35
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 163 cjcalleman 29-Jul-20 14:25
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 154 PB Bytes 29-Jul-20 16:18
The random part 155 drrayeye 29-Jul-20 17:32
Re: The random part 160 PB Bytes 29-Jul-20 18:51
Re: The random part 161 Susan Doris 30-Jul-20 07:12
Re: The random part 159 PB Bytes 30-Jul-20 18:36
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 155 cjcalleman 29-Jul-20 18:54
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 153 PB Bytes 29-Jul-20 20:00
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 155 Susan Doris 30-Jul-20 07:08
lost yet again 160 drrayeye 30-Jul-20 08:48
Re: lost yet again 166 Susan Doris 30-Jul-20 12:10
Investment 161 drrayeye 30-Jul-20 20:28
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 155 PB Bytes 30-Jul-20 18:25
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 165 Susan Doris 31-Jul-20 05:57
Finally 173 drrayeye 21-Jul-20 19:56
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 202 michael seabrook 24-Jul-20 07:37
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 158 cjcalleman 29-Jul-20 21:07
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 153 PB Bytes 29-Jul-20 21:17
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 153 cjcalleman 29-Jul-20 22:47
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 162 PB Bytes 30-Jul-20 02:11
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 157 PB Bytes 29-Jul-20 21:32
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 168 cjcalleman 29-Jul-20 22:55
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 150 Glass Jigsaw 13-Aug-20 00:51
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 151 cjcalleman 13-Aug-20 00:55
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 162 Glass Jigsaw 13-Aug-20 01:48
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 159 cjcalleman 13-Aug-20 14:09
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 154 Glass Jigsaw 14-Aug-20 14:22
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 165 cjcalleman 14-Aug-20 22:40
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 166 Glass Jigsaw 15-Aug-20 00:42
If you're seriously interested 219 drrayeye 15-Aug-20 18:29
Re: Welcome to Bruce Fenton our Author of the Month for July 2020 182 seasmith 15-Aug-20 03:03
Mod Caution General > Off-Topic Post Hijacking 157 Dr. Troglodyte 12-Aug-20 17:58


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.