Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
My post [grahamhancock.com] was intended to update the time aspect concerning the rate of obliquity change, associated with 'precession' - a gyrating action incurred by Earth's axis and of which true polar wander is a product.

In context of this configuration, velocity and angular momentum pertaining the parabolic path to which our planet is held by its host star (likewise our satellite respective Earth's gravity), the distance or mass of the Sun, Moon and planets is of no consequence whatsoever... Non-withstanding extant primary axial rotation (spin), any object can incur secondary axial rotation: off-set from the former, whereby the Polar axis is perturbed, there simply is no force to counter such.

Accordingly, Mars or any other planet, could exhibit its own particular precession (or not at all) - determined by the relevant criteria of the most recent impact. As such, precession can be altered or re-set to another plane. The introduction of this post [grahamhancock.com] elaborates on the phenomenon of axes of rotation encountered by outward expanding dimensions.

By contrast, your inferred textbook theories & formula [grahamhancock.com] is typical closed system, terrestrial Law - 'downward' gravity in contact with the surface of Earth - eg. the spinning top & the apple tree. Neither of which conform functionally respective 'off-shore', in space...

Therefore, calculation pertaining the duration of precession merely involve direction and momentum transfer - i.o.w. the time of one axial revolution - respective which, Earth's orbit around the Sun has no bearing at all. It's advisable to actually read the threads in this topic and the article links that I provided for your perusal.




Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 07-Feb-21 09:19 by hendrik dirker.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Great Year 15913 Barbelo 10-Aug-19 22:10
Re: The Great Year 504 Merrell 11-Aug-19 13:53
Re: The Great Year 495 Martinsw1 13-Aug-19 18:13
Re: The Great Year 392 Barbelo 13-Aug-19 21:02
Re: The Great Year 402 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 00:31
Re: The Great Year 417 Barbelo 14-Aug-19 03:44
Re: The Great Year 360 Corpuscles 14-Aug-19 21:31
Re: The Great Year 406 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 04:13
Re: The Great Year 367 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 06:10
Re: The Great Year 405 Barbelo 15-Aug-19 21:32
Re: The Great Year 370 Corpuscles 15-Aug-19 22:20
Re: The Great Year 365 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 03:42
Eminence 392 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 07:14
Re: Eminence 383 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 21:08
What is all the fuss about the Great Year? 375 greengirl5 19-Aug-19 22:49
Re: The Great Year 512 hendrik dirker 15-Aug-19 14:00
Re: The Great Year 407 Corpuscles 16-Aug-19 08:35
Re: The Great Year 439 hendrik dirker 16-Aug-19 10:20
Re: The Great Year 446 Barbelo 16-Aug-19 22:24
Revisiting the elementary 411 hendrik dirker 18-Aug-19 07:00
Re: Revisiting the elementary 368 Barbelo 18-Aug-19 21:25
Star motion debunks Binary 378 hendrik dirker 19-Aug-19 20:20
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 374 Barbelo 19-Aug-19 21:44
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 359 Corpuscles 19-Aug-19 23:57
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 356 Eddie Larry 20-Aug-19 02:23
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 366 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 02:40
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 364 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 07:27
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 373 Barbelo 20-Aug-19 21:19
It's an illusion 370 hendrik dirker 21-Aug-19 11:12
Re: It's an illusion 357 Barbelo 21-Aug-19 20:57
Re: It's an illusion 340 PB Bytes 21-Aug-19 23:11
Re: It's an illusion 345 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 02:33
Re: It's an illusion 343 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 02:49
Re: It's an illusion 354 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 05:37
Re: It's an illusion 342 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 20:12
Re: It's an illusion 338 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 21:11
Re: It's an illusion 335 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:22
Re: It's an illusion 332 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:49
Re: It's an illusion 356 PB Bytes 22-Aug-19 22:54
lative constant precession rate 369 hendrik dirker 22-Aug-19 07:27
Vedic Comparison 376 Barbelo 22-Aug-19 22:40
Re: Vedic Comparison 379 hendrik dirker 23-Aug-19 11:22
Re: Vedic Comparison 371 Barbelo 23-Aug-19 21:46
Re: 347 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 04:44
Re: Galactic Centre 375 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 06:24
Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 398 hendrik dirker 24-Aug-19 13:23
Re: Putting the binary to bed, with its teddy 363 Barbelo 24-Aug-19 21:22
upon reflection 380 hendrik dirker 25-Aug-19 14:24
Re: upon reflection 414 Barbelo 25-Aug-19 21:12
RosettaStone of ZodiacTime 1183 hendrik dirker 29-Aug-19 07:14
Re:lative constant precession rate 47 hendrik dirker 29-Jan-21 15:51
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 422 hendrik dirker 20-Aug-19 09:04
Re: Star motion debunks Binary 393 Corpuscles 20-Aug-19 11:41
Where is the evidence of the astrological meaning of the precessional "cycle." 34 cjcalleman 02-Feb-21 13:25
Re: astrological meaning of the precessional "cycle." 26 hendrik dirker 03-Feb-21 01:51
Re: astrological meaning of the precessional "cycle." 18 cjcalleman 03-Feb-21 14:27
The precessional cycle 21 hendrik dirker 03-Feb-21 21:21
Re: The precessional cycle 21 cjcalleman 04-Feb-21 14:01
Re: The precessional cycle 24 hendrik dirker 04-Feb-21 22:33
Re: The precessional cycle 21 cjcalleman 05-Feb-21 14:18
Re: The precessional cycle 48 hendrik dirker 05-Feb-21 21:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.