I was interested to read your criticism of Sweatman. I too have an interest in archeoastronomy and was aware of the folly of Sweatman's approach. However, as a hobby, I have been investigating the Westcar Papyrus and applied some thinking similar to Sweatman in what I think is a decoding of sorts. Would be great for someone to run a critical eye over my results: [grahamhancock.com]
I'm also quite keen to understand your thoughts on the use of Stellarium and other tools - you seem to have a concern that they don't work to review dates so far back in the past, what is driving that concern?