I have a question, Martin.

So, it's early in the game at GT, and we are yet to uncover over 90 percent (?) of what we know is there.

If the GTers were consistently using animals for constellations, if only in part, then I'm thinking that as we uncover more sub-sites at GT, we should expect to see certain animals relatively consistently, and in significantly greater proportion than GT's other animals. As far as "significance" is concerned, down the line I would think that one could quite easily do a study similar to your test we have been discussing.

It seems to me that this kind of redundancy requirement is pretty key. Would you agree?