Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
>
Quote

I find that fractional separation of the
> mind into categories of real and unreal are rather
> difficult compromises of the whole brain/body
> experience that we humans actually consider as
> fundamentally actual,


Susan, you quoted my statement but did not comment on it. Is it possible that you had no comment because you did not consider the question valid, or responsive to anything in your categories of intelligible queries?

I just want to know two things: you always say that other people's INTERPRETATION is suspect. Another thing you always proscribe is the "100% verifiable and confirmed evidence of all objective tests" as the contention of your viewpoint.

I would like to be you, for a moment. Yes, interpretation is the key component to actual reliable proof of any mental assignment of inference. And yes, 100% verifiable evidence, by whatever mechanical means, supposedly if that means is calibrated by a sensor of meticulous accuracy, is the ONLY ABLE MEANS of providing a concensus to the test at hand.

Now, I do not dispute any preference one way or another. It is, or it is not; a peculiar compromise in this consideration. What I am after is the SUSPICION OF VALIDATION through all possible scenarios of exoneration and clarification of the matter at hand; namely, the test of individual subjectivity and testimony, were they superficial or extraordinarily adept at providing a result that composes both a viewpoint and a HISTORY of completeness in the core of such investigation. I do rather prefer a result that can be reworked by other tests of actuality. It is paramount that physical conditions be satisfied in every test of each, and every, test of the experience of a person's "information".

I think that, imperceptibly, a person CAN ONLY GIVE THEIR INTERPRETATION at any given moment according to their current bias of knowledge, and cannot be distinguished as either superior or inferior to the model of factual indices of individual perceptions. It is more than an individual stake on mental reliabllity can do, considering the outcome of "interpretive" testimony that comes with each and every person due to their own evolutionary development in due process of mental states of subjectivity.

The objective is temporary in it's fleeting test measurements at the time of gauging the status of a claim of personal conviction. The subjective, elongated station of a lifetime interpretation is far reaching and lasting than a mere test for an hour to prove that person's experience as valid, or not.

Is it not more comforting to know that a person's "take" on any subject is a reasonible explanation for their life purpose, rather than a conflicting attitude of concern for their well-being? As it is said, "let it be".

You may, or may not, convince me of another, elusive and temporary test of quality of interpretation, but I am convinced, thoroughly that a person's testimony is valid, within their own rights as a person. I concur with such a testimony, even yours, in liberty of conscience and contemplation (the long thoughts of personal intuition).

There it is: no more, no less.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 3552 Susan Doris 08-Jan-19 16:21
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 507 EvelynRysdyk 10-Jan-19 17:27
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 435 Susan Doris 10-Jan-19 19:45
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 451 cloister 10-Jan-19 20:11
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 436 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 14:56
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 434 cloister 11-Jan-19 16:09
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 410 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 19:35
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 439 cloister 11-Jan-19 19:56
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 429 EvelynRysdyk 11-Jan-19 00:40
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 456 greengirl5 11-Jan-19 08:59
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 418 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 13:02
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 416 Susan Doris 11-Jan-19 13:27
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 434 EvelynRysdyk 11-Jan-19 20:33
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 391 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 14:06
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 426 greengirl5 11-Jan-19 23:16
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 407 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 06:15
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 397 greengirl5 12-Jan-19 12:24
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 401 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 13:07
Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 408 Itatw70s 17-Jan-19 20:39
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 408 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 14:48
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 389 Itatw70s 21-Jan-19 02:17
Re: Please explain the word ASPECT in your quote. 381 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 06:26
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 420 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 13:19
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 414 EvelynRysdyk 12-Jan-19 17:04
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 453 Susan Doris 12-Jan-19 18:36
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 412 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 15:01
Red Herrings 425 drrayeye 17-Jan-19 19:05
Re: Red Herrings 411 Itatw70s 17-Jan-19 23:47
Re: Red Herrings 397 Susan Doris 18-Jan-19 09:00
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 433 Susan Doris 19-Jan-19 12:42
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 391 EvelynRysdyk 19-Jan-19 17:23
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 404 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 10:27
Spirit 408 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 20:57
Re: Spirit 399 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 07:11
Re: Spirit 393 greengirl5 21-Jan-19 11:31
Re: Spirit 406 Eddie Larry 21-Jan-19 16:32
Re: Spirit 398 Susan Doris 21-Jan-19 17:08
Re: Spirit 380 greengirl5 21-Jan-19 20:37
Re: Spirit 382 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 06:24
Re: Spirit 382 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 07:23
Re: Spirit 376 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 07:41
Re: Spirit 386 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 07:57
Re: Spirit 391 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 08:19
Re: Spirit 389 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 09:47
Re: Spirit 382 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 12:40
Re: Spirit 381 greengirl5 22-Jan-19 21:04
Re: Spirit 384 Susan Doris 23-Jan-19 10:25
Re: Spirit 705 greengirl5 23-Jan-19 12:10
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 401 PB Bytes 19-Jan-19 18:16
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 382 EvelynRysdyk 20-Jan-19 00:10
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 394 PB Bytes 20-Jan-19 00:39
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 395 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 06:28
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 381 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 06:19
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 386 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 09:31
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 389 Susan Doris 20-Jan-19 10:45
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 399 greengirl5 20-Jan-19 20:42
Re: the article by Evelyn rysdyk 398 PB Bytes 20-Jan-19 17:02
And the intellectual marathon continues, day after day, hour after hour, moment to moment.... 399 Itatw70s 22-Jan-19 02:04
Re: And the intellectual marathon continues, day after day, hour after hour, moment to moment.... 391 Susan Doris 22-Jan-19 06:08


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.