Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Gary, you mix and match correspondences between three sources of behaviour; procreation (of DNA), technology (interaction between ecology and population density), and culture (a mixture of innate inspiration and imitation). All three are highly structured, mechanistic, predictable, and universal.
Comparing some localised idiosynchrasies, particularly in media that mutate fast and allow local variation (such as re-allocation of the same set of sounds to different elements of the same set of meanings), reveal only our innate need to seem to have different identities. Underlying stuctures, even in all cultural media, are universal, as archetypal as physics, chemistry and number.
You accept the broad scientific assumption that cultural behaviour could arise only from either invention or adoption (Endicott and Welsch, in 'Taking sides, clashing views on controversial issues in anthropology', do not probe much further either, but they separate biological, migration, linguistic, and culture issues), but you do not study this question. Language and other media, for example, are not inseparable. You study migration routes, and superficial correspondences. These mutate within narrow ranges, like DNA and technology do. You pick out some isolated features, much like some linguists pick out the sound of some words to track migration. Yet a new study proves that all languages tend to use similar sound patterns for similar meanings. Language, particularly grammar, and thus meaning, and thus perception, is hard wired in us and in our environment. So are all cultural media.
As I posted in comment on your article, you adopt some of the silent assumptions of isolationism; that culture needs time to be ‘invented’ and ‘developed’; and that stylistic markers indicate transmission routes of the core content of culture. You may as well argue that technology (ensemble), intelligence and even perception depends on empire, or Head Office. As you argue that “cultures that do not interact ultimately stagnate… stunted growth in the backwaters of the world.”
There is a test case of a culture isolated in time and place by low population and weather, at Gobekli Tepe, about BC 8500. Their scouts brought flint from far and wide. Their cultural record is a full ensemble, including snakes. Their influence by conscious diffusion on the next known civilisation, Sumeria, next door but 4000 years later, is doubtful.
Compare Gobekli reliefs (particularly the two complex artworks on pillar D43 and pillar H56), with Harappan, Mohenjo Daro relief seals, some of them are on
[mindprintart.wordpress.com]
You would need several stretches of supposed oral tradition and cultural missions to explain the overwhelming similarities.
There is a simpler explanation for culture; one DNA, one environment, one species, one consciousness. Same dreams, stories, calendar, ritual cycle, aspirations, technology, art, music, grammar. Some media allow thick layers of idiosyncrasy, of which every group makes full use to bond for the purpose of getting a corner on exploiting the environment, and rival groups, and one another. Those differences are artificial, but camouflage our overwhelming similarities.
You are practicing a kind of correspondence theory; these aprons or rituals or words or things look the same, therefore one set was the model for the other (which is often true), and therefore they were not re-invented (which is usually true); and therefore every society needs instruction, or it would devolve (which is false).

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 3191 gadavid 10-Apr-18 22:17
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 700 Edmond 14-Apr-18 09:47
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 640 gadavid 15-Apr-18 20:23
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 688 Edmond 16-Apr-18 12:53
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 638 gadavid 17-Apr-18 19:26
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 631 gadavid 17-Apr-18 23:34
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 652 Edmond 18-Apr-18 10:00
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 623 gadavid 18-Apr-18 22:18
Being hard wired 625 drrayeye 19-Apr-18 06:24
Re: Being hard wired 626 Edmond 19-Apr-18 08:54
Re: Being hard wired 604 Aine 19-Apr-18 12:34
The scientific literature 650 drrayeye 19-Apr-18 13:26
Re: Being hard wired 653 gadavid 19-Apr-18 22:54
Re: Being hard wired 609 gadavid 19-Apr-18 23:18
Re: Being hard wired 647 Edmond 20-Apr-18 07:32
If you want tobe taken seriously by scientists 631 drrayeye 20-Apr-18 15:22
Re: Being hard wired 605 Eddie Larry 20-Apr-18 16:58
Re: Being hard wired 610 gadavid 21-Apr-18 05:08
Re: Being hard wired 611 Edmond 21-Apr-18 14:53
Re: Being hard wired 603 Eddie Larry 21-Apr-18 17:27
Re: Being hard wired 598 gadavid 22-Apr-18 21:52
Re: Being hard wired 642 gadavid 22-Apr-18 22:01
Re: Being hard wired 610 Edmond 23-Apr-18 09:29
Re: Being hard wired 637 gadavid 23-Apr-18 22:21
Re: Being hard wired 600 Edmond 24-Apr-18 10:30
Re: Being hard wired 659 gadavid 24-Apr-18 23:23
Re: Being hard wired 693 Edmond 25-Apr-18 09:21
Re: Being a hard wired pain 602 MDaines 25-Apr-18 10:57
Re: Being hard wired 989 gadavid 25-Apr-18 19:38
Re: Being hard wired 619 Eddie Larry 19-Apr-18 18:31
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 684 PB Bytes 14-Apr-18 16:56
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 627 gadavid 16-Apr-18 00:15
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 651 drrayeye 17-Apr-18 21:56
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 609 gadavid 17-Apr-18 23:19
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 649 drrayeye 18-Apr-18 08:09
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 614 gadavid 18-Apr-18 22:30
Re: Cultural Diffusionism vs. Cultural Isolationism 612 drrayeye 19-Apr-18 05:26
To disprove a theory, all that is needed is a single true counter factual 590 Race Jackson 24-Apr-18 00:06
Re: To disprove a theory, all that is needed is a single true counter factual 599 Edmond 24-Apr-18 10:39


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.