Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Good for you, Jude!!! The more we constitute consciousness with elaborate displays of awareness and reaction, the more we widen the doorway to experiences of such intrinsic levels of that formula of consciousness. That is that somehow we can not miss the obvious: life is all pervading, the stuff of awareness and choice at any level of realization. It is spooky to consider the extent of awareness. As the old saying goes, as above, so below, as below, so above. I think it is TOO MUCH INFORMATION, maybe unnecessary to our human awareness. We may consider that consciousness is too much the ALL, yet most people live constrained lives, with or without awareness of OTHER life forms. It is too easy to just soak in the basic forms of life, without scrutinizing the possibility of Many levels of awareness and reaction. I know I become breathless when I consider the EXTENT of life, here, and elsewhere (Mars?).

The truth may set you free, but how willing is one to prescribe the immensity of that realization of LIFE?

What gets me is that we humans are so imaginative to suspect life "out there" but we barely consider "here" on Earth as the best possible candidate for exploring life. That is not to say there isn't life elsewhere, but as least here we have the abundant evidence of life at every level.

You should dissolve all discrimination of individuality and absorb all things into a harmonious oneness.
The virtue of a highly evolved being embraces all people and things and dispels the darkness which isolates them.

Hua Hu Ching-primary lesson.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 1696 laughin 15-Nov-17 04:50
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 395 greengirl5 15-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 437 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 00:23
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 379 greengirl5 16-Nov-17 01:00
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 369 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 01:27
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 384 drrayeye 16-Nov-17 03:02
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 392 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 04:38
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 404 drrayeye 16-Nov-17 07:13
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 373 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 16:19
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 365 drrayeye 17-Nov-17 00:02
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 356 PB Bytes 17-Nov-17 01:59
Self assembly of nanoparticles 379 drrayeye 17-Nov-17 06:20
Re: Self assembly of nanoparticles 383 judecurrivan 17-Nov-17 08:58
I see that and raise you one 361 laughin 17-Nov-17 23:13
are we having fun yet? 422 drrayeye 18-Nov-17 06:11
Re: are we having fun yet? 350 laughin 18-Nov-17 15:55
Explaining the waggle dance 361 drrayeye 18-Nov-17 18:51
Re: Explaining the waggle dance 405 Eddie Larry 19-Nov-17 14:44
Bee-ja-vu 387 laughin 20-Nov-17 14:51
Re: Bee-ja-vu 378 drrayeye 20-Nov-17 20:24
Re: Bee-ja-vu 404 laughin 21-Nov-17 02:10
Re: Bee-ja-vu 439 PB Bytes 21-Nov-17 03:26
Socrates? 381 greengirl5 19-Nov-17 08:58
Re: Panpsychism Is Crazy, but It’s Also Most Probably True 367 laughin 17-Nov-17 01:27
Microbial Matters 404 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 02:51
Re: Microbial Matters 366 laughin 16-Nov-17 03:25
Re: Microbial Matters 389 PB Bytes 16-Nov-17 04:31
Re: Microbial Matters 367 judecurrivan 17-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Microbial Matters 369 Itatw70s 18-Nov-17 00:37
Re: Microbial Matters 355 judecurrivan 22-Nov-17 11:34
Your Gaia book 436 greengirl5 18-Nov-17 20:34
Re: Your Gaia book 359 judecurrivan 22-Nov-17 11:40
Re: Your Gaia book 787 greengirl5 27-Nov-17 06:41


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.