Author of the Month :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
Join us at this forum every month for a discussion with famous popular authors from around the world. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh Newman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Aine. I'll repeat the first part I wrote to
> Robert: The physical remain have gone.

I don't mean to sound smug or anything, but without the physical remains there is no hypothesis to test.

The
> Smithsonian don't have ANY OF THEM anymore. We
> know they excavated seventeen 7 ft - 8ft skeletons
> as they are published in their own annual reports,
> and they received many more. When the Native
> American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
> (NAGPRA) was passed in 1990, any remaining giant
> skeletons and bones were removed from public
> display and buried according to the traditions of
> individual tribes. We often get asked: “where
> are the bones?” and we reply: “ask the
> Smithsonian and the Native Americans” as only
> they know. Saying that, The Smithsonian deny they
> ever existed.

Has it occurred to you that they may not have existed? You need to put this into historical context and look at the scientific cold war that was going on between North America and Europe at the time. Those stories may well have been fabricated to impress their European counterparts, who were digging up massive skeletons all over the place and snickering at how weak the Americas were in the Big Skeleton department.

There was also a push, including by the Smithsonian, to minimize any achievements of the Native Americans. They thought of the Natives as stupid, weak and inferior savages who couldn't possibly have built anything. It was racism, pure and simple, and gave them the justification they craved for the murder and extermination of the native peoples.

>
> Also, some authenticated ones are over 9ft tall,

I don't believe that. At all. I could go along with you until this. Show me the skeletons and I'll think about it, but without one, no. One skeleton maybe (genetic outliers do happen), but not several in a small population group or sample. One could be an outlier and I'll bet real money that the person didn't live past their teens. There is a real biological consequence for large humans outside their genetic range: they don't live long enough to reproduce.

> so there is a mystery here that we wish academia
> would take seriously. In the same way, Dinosaurs
> are well beyond the normal range, but they
> existed!

Okay, you really don't want to go there. :)) If we're going to go off into Expanding Earth theory, we may as well stop right now.

Why the Smithsonian decided to deny their
> existence is very worrying indeed and we
> investigate them in 'The Smithsonian Files'
> chapter. The debate continues as to who built the
> mounds but there are detailed myths of an ancient
> race of rather nasty giants, and much nicer ones,
> and as so many giants are found in mounds we must
> consider that they built them. We cover this in
> the 'Legends of the Tall Ones' chapter. In
> Britain, we have over 40 accounts of giant
> skeletons being found.

With no corroborating evidence.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 2138 Graham Hancock 02-Nov-15 08:09
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 568 Misterx 02-Nov-15 13:04
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 651 Hugh Newman 02-Nov-15 14:53
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 491 Aine 02-Nov-15 19:10
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 597 Hugh Newman 02-Nov-15 21:41
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 454 Aine 03-Nov-15 16:03
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 480 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 19:21
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 463 Aine 03-Nov-15 19:38
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 508 Jim Vieira 04-Nov-15 19:46
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 435 Aine 06-Nov-15 14:15
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 448 thirdpal 06-Nov-15 15:02
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 483 Aine 06-Nov-15 15:13
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 411 thirdpal 06-Nov-15 15:29
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 422 Aine 06-Nov-15 15:37
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 494 carolb 03-Nov-15 17:26
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 616 Hugh Newman 03-Nov-15 18:09
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 417 Jim Vieira 04-Nov-15 19:49
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 485 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 19:11
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 486 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 19:15
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 424 Aine 03-Nov-15 19:20
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 407 Jim Vieira 04-Nov-15 19:30
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 473 Misterx 02-Nov-15 22:37
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 424 dong 03-Nov-15 22:59
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 435 Jim Vieira 04-Nov-15 19:21
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 460 robert2467 02-Nov-15 19:31
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 584 Hugh Newman 02-Nov-15 21:36
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 547 carolb 03-Nov-15 00:03
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 417 Aine 03-Nov-15 16:08
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 493 carolb 03-Nov-15 17:14
Karankawa 474 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Nov-15 00:57
Re: Karankawa 398 Aine 04-Nov-15 01:17
Re: Karankawa 439 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Nov-15 17:10
Re: Karankawa 422 thirdpal 05-Nov-15 20:29
Re: Karankawa 461 Dr. Troglodyte 06-Nov-15 00:46
Re: Karankawa 403 Aine 06-Nov-15 14:36
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 545 Greg Little 04-Nov-15 16:39
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 440 Aine 04-Nov-15 17:40
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 443 thirdpal 06-Nov-15 15:18
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 460 Aine 06-Nov-15 19:17
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 424 thirdpal 05-Nov-15 19:27
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 512 Aine 04-Nov-15 00:22
Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 479 Ratcho 03-Nov-15 06:32
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 421 Aine 03-Nov-15 16:09
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 509 Ratcho 03-Nov-15 16:21
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 466 Aine 03-Nov-15 16:38
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 442 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 19:33
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 403 Aine 03-Nov-15 19:39
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 429 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 19:53
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 444 Aine 03-Nov-15 20:03
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 451 thirdpal 03-Nov-15 20:22
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 433 Aine 03-Nov-15 20:33
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 408 laughin 06-Nov-15 00:49
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 466 Aine 06-Nov-15 14:33
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 380 carolb 06-Nov-15 14:53
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 502 Aine 06-Nov-15 15:00
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 395 carolb 06-Nov-15 15:25
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 453 laughin 06-Nov-15 15:55
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 395 Aine 06-Nov-15 16:52
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 497 laughin 06-Nov-15 20:31
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 480 Aine 07-Nov-15 02:19
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 414 Jim Vieira 11-Nov-15 16:05
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 482 Aine 11-Nov-15 23:06
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 462 thirdpal 12-Nov-15 22:07
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 423 Jim Vieira 13-Nov-15 15:56
Re: Good to see some authors I readily recognize. 486 Aine 13-Nov-15 17:52
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 448 thirdpal 12-Nov-15 23:10
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 450 Jim Vieira 13-Nov-15 13:19
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 446 thirdpal 13-Nov-15 15:54
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 478 Jim Vieira 13-Nov-15 16:06
Re: Thanks to Ted Loukes and welcome Hugh Newman and Jim Vieira 456 thirdpal 13-Nov-15 17:31
Mod Request > New Topics 821 Dr. Troglodyte 13-Nov-15 18:07


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.