> > > To eat meat is a life choice to partake of a food
> > that
> > > relies on cruelty/torture etc.
> > It's what humans do, their ominvories, to change this
> > evolutiinary trend is a fad or life choice, it may lead us
> > somewhere else, to to cut meat out is a lifechoice. No
> > tribes cut meat out, only ppl in modern society.
> That has nothing to do with whether eating meat is necessary or
Humans are herbviores, it's not a life choice, it's what we are, bull fighting is ,lfe choice, as is cutting out meat.
> > I'm not confiusing anything.
> So you are deliberately referring to the slaughter of animals
> as 'all food preparation'?
Not all, some. I know for a fact that not all animals are cruelly slaughteered, you were making out that they were.
> As your argument relies on the last sentence being true and not
> your subjective viewpoint, it is a fallacy.
No it does not. Animals can be kileld without crulety. Your wrong.
> > It's
> > simple to see why they are diffeent, you are making
> > where tbhey don't exist for you own goal. whatever it is
> It's simple to see why someone would want to believe that for
> their own goal - whatever that is.
I don't have a goal here. You are trying to say that bull fighting is like killing animals for food, it's not, I don't know what your goal is.