> > relies on cruelty/torture etc.
> It's what humans do, their ominvories, to change this
> evolutiinary trend is a fad or life choice, it may lead us
> somewhere else, to to cut meat out is a lifechoice. No
> tribes cut meat out, only ppl in modern society.
That has nothing to do with whether eating meat is necessary or cruel.
> I'm not confiusing anything.
So you are deliberately referring to the slaughter of animals as 'all food preparation'?
> fighting is a specatle aimed to satisfy lust etc. eating meat
> is not the same. The argument theye are the same is fallacious.
> Meat can be providded ethically and without cruelty.
As your argument relies on the last sentence being true and not your subjective viewpoint, it is a fallacy.
> simple to see why they are diffeent, you are making comparisons
> where tbhey don't exist for you own goal. whatever it is
It's simple to see why someone would want to believe that for their own goal - whatever that is.
'When I despair I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it-always.'