> > To not eat meat is a life choice of food intake.
> > is a life choice to parrtake in an entertainment that relise
> > cruelty/torture etc.
> To eat meat is a life choice to partake of a food industry that
> relies on cruelty/torture etc.
It's what humans do, their ominvories, to change this evolutiinary trend is a fad or life choice, it may lead us somewhere else, to to cut meat out is a lifechoice. No tribes cut meat out, only ppl in modern society.
> > In short. Bullfighting is cuel and tortuous, and it is
> > to be so. Food preparation does not have to be this way, bull
> > fighting does. You are assuming all food preparation is like
> > bullfighting, seems like specious reasoning to me.:D[/i]
> Lol - now you are confusing food preparation with the meat
> industry (shocked emoticon)!
> You are claiming that there is a moral distinction between
> bullfighting and eating slaughtered cattle. I am merely saying
> there is no evidence to support your stance.
I'm not confiusing anything. You seem to be confused. Bull fighting is a specatle aimed to satisfy lust etc. eating meat is not the same. The argument theye are the same is fallacious. Meat can be providded ethically and without cruelty. It's simple to see why they are diffeent, you are making comparisons where tbhey don't exist for you own goal. whatever it is