what exactly about the science leads one to truly believe that this wasn't a problem back then as compared to what concerns NASA currently? All the data being 'lost' doesn't make one wonder as in 'what the hell'? We know that the lander had, for all intents, no shielding or certainly inadequate shielding, to protect from what is known to be lethal radiation etc. No Problem? ;)
Gotta start over with Orion? ...really believe this is a reasonable explanation? We did it easily X's what 6?, and yet they are telling us that it's like a lost technology and will take forever to recover/redo? See that shabbily built piece of shit that you believe carried man to the moon?...I'm the crazy one? pfft
I'm just disappointed that more posters here are unable to see the truth. Of course we didn't go in this piece of junk. Does engineering and equipment spec's matter? Put a fucking pipe- with foil tape to hold in place ...
on the ladder? ha ha ha ha ahhhh ;(
but but...the laser deflectors! dummyies.
yes on purpose btw ;)
Not a speck of dust...
Carol thinks that the Mexican Airforce pilots saw Texan oilrigs in the sky...
is it any wonder why she asks the questions she does? Size of the Earth does matter ;)