in both cases an actual fact has been distorted. Personally being able to read the same texts in both their pre an post translated forms it's easy to see what sitchin has done. Deliberately changed the facts to fit his hypothesis. In the case of the cupacabra the descriptions given by frightened puerto ricans over the years have differed greatly. It led me to believe that there was something there. But being a realist i think it's possible to see that there is a real animal behind all the rumours. Then an unknown animal matching some of the more rational animals is shot dead. twice. Of course i don't believe that it's a demon with wings and eyes of fire. More like a member of the canine family that's shy of humanity and nocturnal.
Why do you find my thought patterns so hard to understand. Do you believe in either planet x or the mythical chupacabra