Paranormal & Supernatural :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions of everything that might be classed as ‘paranormal‘ - i.e. not currently accepted by our modern scientific paradigm. 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Richard,

Are we evolving passed this 'selfish' phase? I guess some people are and always have been but, it's not a trend that is immediately obvious. Is this not known as the 'I want it now' generation?

Physically and mentally we are regressing or at least stagnating to some extent. I know people will argue that our technology shows we are progressing but, in fact only our technology is evolving to produce better technology while we become ever more reliant on that technology. Doesn't sound like WE are actually progressing does it?

As a species we have not altered for at least 30,000 years. This was around the time when the male Y chromosome became so damaged it could not be fixed and took on it's 'Y' characteristic. Some studies now show that there was a male genetic 'bottleneck' at this time producing the 'mitochondrial Adam' all current men are decended from. If you think about it, it's quite scary.

It is believed each and every one of us today carries at least one genetic defect in our recessive genes. If you consider the Human Genome project used the DNA of one individual then there could be countless errors and undesirable charateristics that are now considered the benchmark for our understanding of everyone's genetic make-up.

I really have to question Medicine's role in all this too. We 'cure' diseases with drugs that, if left to our natural defenses, would allow our immune system to evolve. This aspect of our evolution has ceased in every 'developed' country. Indeed, we have now created drug resistant strains of most of the common 'killer' bugs of the Victorian era. Drugs are obviously not the solution we thought they were and, in our arrogance we continue to develop 'better' drugs which will no doubt result in even better killer bugs.

What about industry? We've been polluting the environment for over 200 years and now it seems the oceans have been taking the brunt of this onslaught. The seas are becoming acid so, if the plankton don't evolve, the seas, which are the real air refinery since we destroyed most of the forests, could die too and us along with them.

Human evolution eh? Somehow I don't see it. Unless we're becoming cold-blodded, UV tolerant, anerobic bottom-feeders.

The only way we can evolve is to let Nature start doing its thing again. We need to back-off and accept that Nature knows best. Its what got us here in the first place and somehow I don't think Nature intended us to start destroying or usurping our own creator...

You see all we're actually getting good at is managing our own stupidity. If we weren't placing such demands on Nature we wouldn't need to think about changing the genetic code of our crops to make them grow bigger, stronger, faster. We wouldn't be poisoning the food chain with pesticides, fertilisers, ripening agents etc. We have gone off the rails, plain and simple.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 485 Eddy 03-Jun-04 07:43
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 154 fiascohoho 03-Jun-04 09:04
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 215 David L 03-Jun-04 13:31
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 161 Brian Patterson 03-Jun-04 17:45
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 166 fisherman 03-Jun-04 22:56
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 232 David L 04-Jun-04 03:18
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 190 Eddy 04-Jun-04 05:17
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 241 Zurg 20-Aug-04 12:37
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 158 Milo 04-Jun-04 16:26
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 223 Brian Patterson 04-Jun-04 23:16
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 157 Brian Patterson 05-Jun-04 22:26
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 162 Milo 06-Jun-04 01:02
The two heads of Christianity 206 Eddy 06-Jun-04 08:48
Re: The two heads of Christianity 155 Milo 06-Jun-04 14:48
Re: The two heads of Christianity 137 Kees 06-Jun-04 17:32
Re: The two heads of Christianity 164 Milo 06-Jun-04 18:21
Re: The two heads of Christianity 156 Kees 06-Jun-04 18:24
Re: The two heads of Christianity 152 Milo 06-Jun-04 18:34
Re: The two heads of Christianity 173 Sherman Peabody 06-Jun-04 19:01
Re: The two heads of Christianity 197 Milo 06-Jun-04 23:09
Re: The two heads of Christianity 177 Kees 06-Jun-04 23:36
Re: The two heads of Christianity 178 Milo 07-Jun-04 00:29
personal vs. group reality 215 wirelessguru1 07-Jun-04 02:53
Peasants, Moderators and Dictators! 165 Milo 07-Jun-04 04:37
Re: personal vs. group reality 156 Mark Staab 08-Jun-04 02:29
Re: The two heads of Christianity 195 Hoppy 07-Jun-04 22:08
Re: The two heads of Christianity 178 Kboldt 08-Jun-04 20:39
Re: The two heads of Christianity 150 banah 24-Jul-04 12:41
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 155 Brian Patterson 07-Jun-04 20:18
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 135 Brian Patterson 07-Jun-04 20:21
The Third Rome 149 Akula 26-Jun-04 17:21
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 187 banah 24-Jul-04 12:53
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 160 Eddie Larry 09-Aug-04 04:12
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 157 IanG 09-Aug-04 06:32
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 131 degiem1 09-Aug-04 10:21
Re: The Book with Seven Seals. What type of book was it ? 162 IanG 10-Aug-04 08:32
Evolving 182 Richard Fusniak 13-Aug-04 11:15
Re: Evolving 151 IanG 14-Aug-04 04:24
Re: Evolving 161 Eddie Larry 16-Aug-04 03:20


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.