Of course the solar fusion model of the Sun failed. Any dissident who has done their homework realizes that happened back in the 1970's with the discovery of radial global harmonic oscilliation periods of 2 hours and 47 minutes, which were discovered by independent teams from different countries. Electric universe never mentions this. I wonder why?

Of course the findings were, 1. ignored, 2. ridiculed and 3. explained away. This happened because the Sun being a young, hot homogeneous (same thickness) star did not (still does not) fit the paradigm. The Earth and all the evolving stars in our system HAD TO BE the same age as the central object, yet its just not true at all. The central object is in fact the youngest of all the solar system bodies.

Long frequency radial oscillations mean that the entire body of the Sun oscillates as if it was a large homogeneous (undifferentiated) body. This means it does not have a nuclear core and that it is very young, as should be expected by a hot, bright star.

The differentiation process happens as it cools and material is collected internally, i.e. the accretion process of planet formation. Of course this is ignored and ridiculed. But here we are, standing on the core remains of an ancient star that has already gone through billions of years of the process. Electric universe also ignores this. I wonder why?

The dogmatists say, "there's no evidence of this happening". I say, all the observations and evidence point to this. In fact, that's why all the objects in the solar system, and all of the Kepler discoveries are all different sizes, this is expected, since the scale of time involved is many hundreds of millions of years, of course there are objects that are different sizes, they all formed at different times and are in different stages to their evolution.

The case grows stronger by the day, not ONE single exoplanetary system (evolving stars) matches another. If the nebular disk/protoplanetary disk models and theories were correct, then why do stars that are clearly very, very similar not have similar objects in about the same orbital configurations and sizes orbiting them? I mean, if their theories were correct, then why is the solar system to this day, one of a kind? They have no answer for that.

Edit: Oh and be careful of following the EU crowd. They think they're the only ones who can point out serious flaws in the dogma, they think they have a dissident monopoly. They don't, in fact, they do not have a suitable replacement. Sure, they can appear to be going in the right direction simply because they have found serious flaws in the dogma, but any average dissident can do that. The trick is replacing them with something that actually works.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12-Mar-18 07:19 by jeffreyw.