Exactly. Remember too red dwarfs cannot cool and lose mass to become brown dwarfs in the dogma. To them, brown dwarfs are very young, and red dwarfs are very old. So naturally if they have a red dwarf cooling and losing mass to become a brown dwarf, well that's impossible, because it would mean a really old object just instantaneously becomes really young. to fix this MAJOR MISTAKE IN REASONING AND THEORY they just cook up another term to cover their failure, called "ultracool dwarf".

I wrote a paper on that.
http://vixra.org/pdf/1705.0114v1.pdf

If they are going to correct themselves (which they probably won't, they will accept contradictions and pile up contradictions in theory for as long as they can get away with it, they have to play the credibility game), then they will have to re-date brown dwarfs as being much older, and red dwarfs as much younger. I do not think they will fix that. Peer review will censor everything that is not in line with the dogma.

They won't fix their theory because there is just too much stuff accepted that is wrong, and those are the peer-reviewers and journal editors. There is heavy pressure to conform to the dogma, or else. To begin fixing anything, will lead to everything else that is supported by it to come into question. The problem is that they have the very beginning assumption false, they think there are three mutually exclusive objects now, stars, brown dwarfs and planets, yet they are the same objects, only in different stages to their evolution. They are all astrons. This understanding is a career ender. Nature will end careers. Go figure.

When all the theory and models are based on a huge false assumption, then all theory and models based on that assumption are false too. That is the predicament they are in. They are going to try and just fix little pieces and parts and patch their theories and models, but none of it is going to have any lasting effect unless they correct the root of the problem. This is similar to the epicycle version of the solar system. They keep on adding more and more patch work to explain away the observations, yet have not realized they need to place the Sun in the center. The refusal to place the Sun in the center just lead to more confusion.

This time it is a different type of fix. They need to play connect the dots with size and luminosity with ALL the objects. They will see that it is a smooth continuum.

I wonder when electric universe will invite me to a conference or just reject this basic discovery too just like the dogma does. I have yet to see one of their videos outline the discovery, so it is an implied rejection I guess.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 28-May-17 13:38 by jeffreyw.