Despite the obvious attributes of facial imagery and overlapping flake scars, the fact that it is from North America alone prevents it from being considered an artifact. No, it can only be a rock of natural occurrence for it lacks conchoidal fracture and facial imagery on stone is most definitely something ancient man would never have imparted as artistic expression. Much the same way as he could never have arrived without bringing Clovis technology with him, he most certainly did not arrive without pressure flaked retouch either!
Tim, each of these assertions are presented without any evidence. What evidence do you have for these assertions?