WhoWeird Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've never operated radar, so I can't give an
> experiential opinion. But my skepticism adheres to
> the same standards. Radar is an observed response,
> which can be flawed, to an event that occurred in
> the real world. Radar echoes, video recordings,
> and human optics are all corruptible.
>
> Let me see and touch this so-called extra-Terran
> matter, and I'll believe it exists. Otherwise, I'm
> just considering it.
>
> But I'm a skeptic, and that's no fun.

So, what would you accept as evidence, then? We believe lots of things with no direct evidence and no visual or experimental confirmation, do we not? Why is it just when it comes to UFOs that people demand incontrovertible proof?

Skeptics try to debunk reports of the phenomenon, not evidence. If radar echoes are corruptible, well, I hope you can prove that in each and every one of those cases the radar was corrupted. If you can't, you've got nothing.