Inner Space :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For discussions on all matters relating to personal development, religion, philosophy, psychology and so on.
>>. . . we may be looking at the bible from two different angles. You assume it was written by the hunter-gatherers and to me it was compiled from ancient Hindu and AE texts and these two civilizations had a vast astronomical knowledge.<<
Maria, my only objection (for now) to connecting ancient Hindu and AE texts is precisely from the standpoint of this astronomical knowledge. It's not native, IMHO, to any of them. I think there's a much later linkage in this regard through the Pani Gene refers to and through the Phoenicians Segestan and Perseus refer to. These were a people, it has been alleged, who travelled all the world's flat, featureless oceans, who had colonies on every continent. Astronomical knowledge makes sense for them; not for the Hebrews. As far as the AE: Maybe they were an original colony of these sea-peoples, but I tend to doubt it -- there's just too many critters wrapped up in their lore. I would, however, suggest that at one time they may have been dominated by these sea-peoples or perhaps highly influenced by these merchants' wares, both intellectually and aesthetically. One must ask the question, why are the French so up in arms today over a couple of McDonald's and a Disneyworld in their country . . . syncretism happens.
I don't know why, but for some reason every time a see a picture of the GP these days I think of an island. Who knows, maybe there are three prominent seamounts out there in the ocean somewhere that used to be these sea-peoples' homes . . .
>>And yes you are probably right that replacing oral tradition with a written script was the first step to a devolution. We got a dead letter without the symbolism explained. There was a book about it few years ago, that argued that the written word (left brain hemisphere/masculine) replacing the visual and auditory (right/feminine/intuitive) has done exactly that, not to mention established the superiority of patriarchal values.<<
No argument here. None. That's exactly where I was going with that. Have you other thoughts in this regard?
Maria, my only objection (for now) to connecting ancient Hindu and AE texts is precisely from the standpoint of this astronomical knowledge. It's not native, IMHO, to any of them. I think there's a much later linkage in this regard through the Pani Gene refers to and through the Phoenicians Segestan and Perseus refer to. These were a people, it has been alleged, who travelled all the world's flat, featureless oceans, who had colonies on every continent. Astronomical knowledge makes sense for them; not for the Hebrews. As far as the AE: Maybe they were an original colony of these sea-peoples, but I tend to doubt it -- there's just too many critters wrapped up in their lore. I would, however, suggest that at one time they may have been dominated by these sea-peoples or perhaps highly influenced by these merchants' wares, both intellectually and aesthetically. One must ask the question, why are the French so up in arms today over a couple of McDonald's and a Disneyworld in their country . . . syncretism happens.
I don't know why, but for some reason every time a see a picture of the GP these days I think of an island. Who knows, maybe there are three prominent seamounts out there in the ocean somewhere that used to be these sea-peoples' homes . . .
>>And yes you are probably right that replacing oral tradition with a written script was the first step to a devolution. We got a dead letter without the symbolism explained. There was a book about it few years ago, that argued that the written word (left brain hemisphere/masculine) replacing the visual and auditory (right/feminine/intuitive) has done exactly that, not to mention established the superiority of patriarchal values.<<
No argument here. None. That's exactly where I was going with that. Have you other thoughts in this regard?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.