I've read many of your posts before, and don't support the direction your thinking has gone, but you've done some great reviews and analyses--raised many interesting questions in a fresh way. Instead of serious discussion, you've become the victim of "professional" debunkers. There's even a website that explains how to do it:
They claim to be defending science, but very few are scientists. They practice what many call "scientism."
As any scientist will tell you, anything can be debunked and discredited, but nothing can be disproven. Though they've made fun of your ideas, "ROTFLMAO", scientists call them "blue sky thinking." From time to time, blue sky thinking leads to testable hypotheses that can be supported with evidence--only to be overthrown--often based some other crazy ideas. Kuhn called it, :"The Structure of Scientific Revolutions":
Keep those dumb ideas, coming, Robert